VIETNAM NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, HANOI 
UNIVERSITY OF LANGUAGES AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES 
FACULTY OF POST-GRADUATE STUDIES 
TRINH
 THI
 HANG 
USING SOFTWARE TO IMPROVE FIRST-YEAR 
ENGLISH MAJORS' PRONUNCIATION: AN ACTION 
RESEARCH AT HONG DUC UNIVERSITY 
SU DUNG PHAN MEM PHAT TRIEN KHA NANG PHAT 
AM CHO SINH VIEN CHUYEN NGANH TIENG ANH NAM 
THU
 NHAT:
 NGHIEN CUU HANH DONG TAI TRUONG 
DAI HOC HONG DUC 
M.A. Minor Program Thesis 
Major: English Language Teaching Methodology 
Code:
 60 14 10 
Supervisor: Do Tuan Minh, PhD 
HANOI-2010 
IV 
TABLE OF CONTENT 
Page 
DECLARATION i 
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
 ii 
ABSTRACT iii 
TABLE OF CONTENT iv 
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS vii 
LIST
 OF DIAGRAMS, CHARTS, AND TABLES
 ^"' 
PARTI.
 INTRODUCTION I 
1.
 Rationale of the study 1 
2.
 Purposes of the study 2 
3.
 Research questions 2 
4.
 Scope of the study 3 
5.
 Method of the study 3 
6. Significance of the study
 ,
 3 
7.
 Design of
 the
 study 3 
PART
 II. DEVELOPMENT 5 
CHAPTER 1. LITERATURE REVIEW
 ,
 5 
1.1. Role of pronunciation in language learning 5 
1.2.
 Aspects
 of pronunciation teaching 6 
1.2.1. Vowel sounds 7 
1.2.2.
 Consonant sounds 8 
1.2.3. Word stress 9 
1.2.4.
 Sentence stress 9 
1.2.5.
 Rhythm
 , 10 
1.2.6.
 Intonation
 , 10 
1.2.7.
 Other aspects of connected speech
 11 
1.3. Approaches to pronunciation teaching
 11 
1.3.1. Explicit or Implicit
 H 
1.3.2.
 Top-down or Bottom-up 13 
1.4.
 Computers-assisted
 language learning (CALL) and EFL learning and 
teaching 14 
1.5. Roles of CALL software in EFL teaching and learning 15 
1.6. Benefits of using CALL softAvarc in EFL teaching and learning 16 
1.7. Limitations of CALL software in EFL learning and teaching 17 
CHAPTER 2.
 METHODOLOGY 
 : 19 
2.1.
 Context
 of the study 19 
2.2.
 Arguments
 for
 the
 use of an action
 research
 19 
2.3.
 Description of the software program 20 
2.4.
 Subjects
 of the study 21 
2.5.
 Instruments
 21 
2.6.
 Procedure
 22 
CHAPTER 3. DATA ANALYSIS, FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION 23 
3.1.
 Findings from the pretest 23 
3.1.1.
 English sounds 23 
3.1.2. Stress 24 
3.1.3.
 Rhythm and thought groups 26 
3.1.4. Intonation 26 
3.1.5.
 Linking 28 
VI 
3.2. The intervention 28 
3.3.
 Findings from the post-test 30 
3.3.1.
 English sounds 30 
3.3.2. Stress 32 
3.3.3.
 Rhythm and thought groups
 ii 
3.3.4. Intonation 34 
3.3.5.
 Linldng
 35 
3.4. Further findings from the
 teacher's obser>ation
 and informal 
intei-view
 with students 37 
PART
 HI. CONCLUSION 39 
1.
 vSummary
 39 
2.
 Pedagogical implication 39 
3.
 Limitations of the study 40 
4.
 Suggestions
 for further research 40 
REFERENCES 42 
APPENDICES I 
VII 
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 
EFL: English as a Foreign Language 
NS:
 Native speaker 
NNS:
 NOP
 native speaker 
IT:
 Information technology 
CALL: Computer-assisted language learning 
CMC:
 Computer mediated communication 
Vlll 
LIST OF DIAGRAMS, CHARTS, AND TABLES 
Diagram 
Diagram!
 English vowels 7 
Tables 
Table I English consonants
 8 
Table 2 Students' common mistakes in producing English sounds 24 
Table 3 Students' stress on important words 24 
Table 4 Students' stress on corrective words 25 
Table 5 Students' intonation of
 statements,
 yes-no questions, wh-questions, 
requests
 and
 suggestions
 27 
Table 6 Students' intonation of lists 27 
Table 7
 Students'
 performance of linking 28 
Tabic 8 Aspects of pronunciation to
 be integrated
 in speaking
 lessons
 29 
Table 9 Comparison of the students' pronunciation of English sounds in the 
pretest and posttest 30 
Table
 10
 Students' stress on important words 32 
Table I
 1
 Students' stress on corrective words 32 
Table 12
 Students'
 intonation of statements, yes-no questions, wh-questions, 
polite requests
 and
 suggestions
 34 
Table
 13
 Students' intonation of lists 35 
Table 14 Students' performance of linking 35 
Charts 
Chart I Rhythm and thought groups 26 
Chart 2 Rhythm and thought groups 33 
PART I. INTRODUCTION 
1.
 Rationale of the study 
In the last decades, the general goals of teaching have primed the effective use of the spoken 
language to establish successful communication. That is why there has been a steady growth 
in the attention to the magnitude of speaking and pronunciation teaching. This fact has brought 
about an emergent debate about models, goals and particularly, the methodology used for 
speaking and pronunciation teaching. 
A
 number
 of research
 studies
 have dealt with pronunciation
 teaching
 and
 problems
 students 
face
 in English pronunciation. The
 research
 findings have revealed that pronunciation 
frequently interferes with communication. As a
 matter
 of fact, communication may break 
down
 when people
 pronounce incorrectly.
 Moreover,
 learners
 with good pronunciation are 
usually
 more
 proficient speakers and more successful language learners than
 those
 with poor 
pronunciation. 
Since I started teaching at Hong
 Due
 University, I have taught speaking and pronunciation to 
first-year
 1-nglish
 majors many times. 1 have always been trying my best to
 help
 my
 students 
pronounce better. However, I have had many frustrations because my
 students
 always have 
many mistakes in their pronunciation.
 1
 have been investigating into the reasons for this, and I 
have found that my students, most of whom are from rural areas in the
 province,
 only
 learned 
grammar and never focused on pronunciation at secondary school. Moreover, they did not 
have much access to native speakers' pronunciation. 
lor non-English majors at other departments of Hong
 Due
 University,
 they are required to 
have intelligible pronunciation. English majors at Foreign
 Department,
 however,
 must go tar 
beyond the intelligibility to the point that they should sound like or nearly like native speakers 
because they will
 become
 teachers of English and their pronunciation will affect man\ 
generations to come. That is the reason why
 frst-year
 English
 majors'
 weak pronunciation has 
been a matter of serious concern
 amonc
 us. 
Due to the importance of pronunciation in language learning and the poor pronunciation of 
first-year English majors at Hong
 Due
 university, I decided to introduce some changes into my 
speaking and pronunciation course for first-year English majors with the hope to improve their 
pronunciation. That
 v/as
 the reason why I conducted this study "Using software to improve 
first-year English majors' pronunciation: An action research at Hong
 Due University \
 which 
tried to
 exploit
 the software programs available in my speaking and pronunciation lessons with 
an aim to improve first-year English majors' pronunciation. 
2.
 Purposes of the study 
The purpose of this study is to improve English pronunciation for first-year English majors at 
I
 long
 Due
 University. Specifically, it has three purposes as follows: 
- To
 identify
 students'
 most common mistakes in
 their
 English pronunciation. 
- To exploit the software program, namely Pronunciation Power as an intervention in 
pronunciation
 lessons
 to
 improve
 students' pronunciation. 
- To justify
 Ihc
 effectiveness of using pronunciation
 software
 in
 teaching
 r:nglish 
pronunciation to first-year English majors. 
3.
 Research questions 
Regarding the importance of pronunciation teaching, purpose of the research and statement of 
the
 problem,
 this study is accomplished to find the answer to the question
 ^How effectively
 is 
software exploited to improve first-year English majors* pronunciation at Hong
 Due 
university?
 *.
 Specifically,
 the study addressed the following three research questions: 
• What are the students' most common problems regarding their English pronunciation? 
•
 Is Pronunciation
 A;MCTeffective
 in
 teaching
 first-year English majors' pronunciation? 
• If
 yes,
 how effective is it? 
4.
 Scope of the study 
The study concentrates on improving first-year English majors at Hong
 Due
 University by 
using the pronunciation software named Pronunciation Power, Within its scope, the research 
was aimed at justifying the effectiveness of using this software program in teaching English 
pronunciation to first-year English majors at Hong Due university. 
5. Methods of the study 
This study is conducted as an action research because it is aimed at improving first-year 
English majors' pronunciation. In
 order
 to get data, a combination of different instruments, 
namely class observation, informal interviews and audio-recording, is used. The data
 collected 
from the observation and interviews will be analyzed by qualitative method, and the data 
collected through the tape scripts will be analyzed by quantitative method. 
6. Significance of the study 
Even though
 there
 have been numerous studies on pronunciation teaching, few investigations 
into
 the use
 of software in teaching pronunciation are
 conducted.
 This
 research
 provides an 
insight into the effectiveness of applying pronunciation software to the teaching of 
pronunciation to first-year English majors. The results of the study
 will,
 therefore,
 be
 much 
beneficial to both teachers who are considering whether to exploit software programs in their 
English pronunciation lessons and students who are interested in using software programs to 
improve their English pronunciation. 
7.
 Design of the study 
The study consists of three main parts as follows. 
The
 first part deals with rationale, purposes, research
 questions,
 scope, methods and design of 
the study. 
The second part contains three chapters, in which chapter I reviews the literature focusing on 
the theoretical basis related to teaching pronunciation and using CALL programs in language 
learning and teaching, chapter 2 presents a detailed description of the research methodology, 
and chapter 3 discusses the findings of the study. 
The final part summarizes all the main ideas expressed throughout the research, provides 
pedagogical implications and suggests further research orientations. 
According to Murphy
 (1991),
 given that most courses emphasize general oral communication 
over pronunciation, teachers must seek creative ways to integrate pronunciation into speaking-
oriented classes in a manner clearly related to the oral communication goals of the course. He 
also adds that pronunciation instruction
 needs'
 to be integrated with broader level 
communicative activities in which speakers and listeners engage in meaning communication. 
It is obvious in my situation as a teacher of English that students' weak pronunciation has 
negative effect on their ability to express themselves and their ability to listen to
 others, 
especially to native speakers. Speakers with wrong pronunciation find it difficult to make 
themselves understood by the teacher and other students, which makes them embarrassed and 
hesitant to continue speaking. Moreover, when a learner has already stuck to the wrong way of 
pronouncing a particular word, phrase or sentence, (s)he is unlikely to recognize the authentic 
pronunciation by a native speaker and fail to
 interpret
 what the speaker
 means. 
Therefore, it can be concluded that pronunciation play an essential
 role
 in
 learning
 a foreign 
language because it is
 intelligible
 pronunciation that make communication possible and
 even
 if 
a
 speaker
 uses the right words with
 the
 right structure hut without
 correct
 or
 inlclligibic 
pronunciation, s(he) is likely to cause misunderstanding, communication interruption, or even 
communication breakdown. 
1.2. Aspects of pronunciation teaching 
As regards what teaching pronunciation involves, Ur (1996:47) claims that "the concept
 oj 
''pronunciation
 " may be said to include: 
- the sounds of the language, or
 phonology, 
- stress and rhythm 
- intonation.
 " 
Martin Hcwings in his book Pronunciation Practice Activities presents that the following 
elements
 should be included in the English pronunciation teaching: 
- Segmental features with more focus on consonants, consonant clusters and vowel length 
- Suprasegmental features consisting of word stress, tonic words, weak and strong forms, 
connected speech and
 tone,
 (pp.15
 -
 16) 
1.2.1. Vowel sounds 
Celce-Murcia,
 M., Brinton, D., and Goodwn, J,
 (1996)
 defines vowels as
 ""sounds
 in which 
there is continual vibration of the vocal cords and the air stream is allowed to escape from the 
mouth in an obstructed
 manner,
 without any
 interruption.'" 
According to Roach
 (1998),
 vowels are
 "'sounds
 in the production of which there is no 
obstruction to
 the
 flow of air as it passes the larynx to the
 lips.''
 Vowels can be classified in 
terms of: 
- the height of
 the
 bulk of
 the
 tongue in the mouth. 
- the front/back position of
 the
 tongue in the mouth the degree of lip-rounding. 
- the length of vowels. 
The classification can be shown in
 the
 following diagram: 
•
 i: 
\ 
• 
\ 
clof« 
1 
1 
tftilit^l 
\ 
• l 
e 
\ 
• 
•a. 
lifLl rrn 
I' 
•
 ^ 
', 
•" 
u 
3 
• 
u: 
i 
, 
• 
j 
• 
D 
• 
a: 
1 
Diagram 1. English vowels 
8 
1.2.2.
 Consonant sounds 
According to Kelly. G, (2003:24),
 "'consonants
 are formed by interrupting, restricting or 
diverting the airflow in a variety of
 ways.'" 
Roach
 (1998)
 define consonants as ""sounds in which there is obstruction to
 thejlow
 of air as 
it passes the larynx to the lips.
 " 
Consonants are classified according to: 
-
 the manner
 of articulation 
- the place of articulation 
- the force of articulation 
The classification of English consonants can
 be
 shown in the following tabic: 
Table /. English consonants 
;
 s 
1
 •-• 
icu 
Manner
 or
 An 
\_ 
1 
L
 . , 
Stop 
hficalivc 
AtTnnitc 
Niis;il 
lateral 
Ap]iro\iinnnt 
RelroHcx 
Approxiiniinl 
Glide 
Iv. 
JlCClCSS 
Bilabial 
P
 b 
m 
S\
 w 
I'lacL'
 of
 Articulalion 
Labio 
dental 
f V 
.:;*^s': 
Imor 
dental 
e
 d 
Alveolar 
[ d 
S 2 
n 
•!p?^l 
.Alveo-
palatal 
^
 3 
tJ rfsl 
Palatal 
j 
Vi-h.r 
k
 J] 
D 
Siflfe orihr(;iottis 
i Voiced 
\ 
Gioital 
V 
h 
j 
! 
i 
• 
1.2.3. Word stress 
Avery and Ehrlich's
 (1992)
 state that word stress involves making vowels longer and louder. 
Randolph Quirk and Sidney Greenbaun
 (1973:450)
 defines stress as the prominence with 
which one part of
 a
 word or of
 a
 longer utterance is distinguished from other parts. According 
to Pennington, stress has at least three prosodic features, which are duration (or length), 
intensity
 (or loudness) and pitch (or fundamental frequency). 
Word stress is closely related to intelligibility because when a word is said with incorrect 
stress pattern, the listener may spend time searching for the word in the wrong stress category. 
A stress pattern mistake can, therefore, cause a great deal of confusion. That is the reason why 
Kelly (2000) emphasizes that it would be practical to
 base
 our teaching
 principle
 on a two-
level division (stressed or
 unstressed). 
1.2.4. Sentence stress 
According to Avery and Ehrlich (1992), in a particular
 sentence,
 one content word receives 
greater stress than all others, which is referred as the major sentence stress. In most cases, the 
major
 sentence
 stress falls on the last content word within a sentence.
 However,
 there are also 
cases in which the major sentence stress will not fall on the final content word of the sentence. 
It depends on the speakers who decide which word in their speech they want to give more or 
less prominence. A word may be given less weight because it has been said already, or it may 
be given
 more weight because the speaker want to highlight it. 
The use of incorrect stress in English can make it difficult for listeners to identify the meaning 
of the sentence. Kenworthy (1987) demonstrates that there is a great deal of evidence that 
native speakers rely very much on the stress pattern of words when they are
 listening,
 and that 
when a native speaker mishears a word, it is because the foreigner has put the stress in
 the 
wrong place, not because he or she mispronounced the sounds of the word. 
10 
1.2.5,
 Rhythm 
Kenworthy (1987:30) claims that rhythm is a product of word stress and the way in which 
important items are foregrounded through their occurrence on a strong beat, and unimportant 
items are backgrounded by their occurrence on a weak beat. Dalton and Scidlhofer
 (1994)
 also 
give the similar description of rhythm concentrating on the contrast
 between
 stress and 
unstress, which states that ""utterances are continuous strings of syllables, the stressed 
syllables provides the foreground and the unstressed ones the backgrounds.
 "
 English has a 
stres.s-timed rhythm, in which stressed syllables recur at equal intervals of time but unstressed 
syllables are unequally spaced in time. The amount of time it takes to say a sentence depends 
on the
 number
 of syllables that receive stress, not on the total number of syllables. This should 
be
 distinguished
 from syllable-timed rhythm like Vietnamese, in which all
 the
 syllables recur 
at
 equal intervals
 of time, stressed or unstressed, so that Vietnamese students can avoid
 the 
interference
 of their mother
 tongue
 in the
 target
 language. 
1.2.6.
 Intonation 
According to Kelly (2000), intonation refers to the way the voice goes up and down in pitch 
when wc are speaking. He also claims that
 "//
 is
 a fundamental
 part of the way we express our 
o\yn
 thoughts and it enables us to understand those of others.
 " 
Four basic tunes of English are as follows: 
-
 The
 falling tune (the glide-down) 
- The first rising tune (the
 glide-up) 
- The second rising tune (the
 take-oft) 
-The falling-rising tune. 
Intonation has
 the
 function as
 the
 expression of
 speaker's
 altitude and purpose in
 sa\ing 
something
 such as greeting you, telling you
 something,
 asking you, ordering
 >ou.
 pleading 
11 
with you or thanking you etc Intonation is therefore important for intelligibility. 
Inappropriate intonation pattern can lead to misunderstanding just as mispronounced sound 
can.
 The importance of raising students' awareness of the uses of four basic tunes of English 
in order to improve their communicative performance is therefore can not be denied. 
1.2.7.
 Other aspects
 of
 connected speech 
The following aspects appear when English is spoken in casual and rapid everyday speech. 
* Assimilation 
According to Kelly (2000), assimilation is the modification of sounds on each other
 when
 they 
meet, usually across word boundaries, but can
 also
 within words. Assimilation is said to be 
progressive when a sound influences a following sound, or regressive when a sound inlluenccs 
one which precedes it. 
* Word linking 
When
 a word finishes with a consonant and is followed by another word which an initial 
vowel,
 the final consonant of the first word will join with the first vowel of the second
 one. 
* Elision 
Kelly
 (2000) define elision as
 ''the
 disappearance of a sound.
 In
 saying an utterance,
 some 
sounds are deleted due to the fast speed and also due to the economy of effort, when people do 
not want to try hard in pronouncing every single sound. 
1.3. Ap|)roaches to pronunciation teaching 
1.3.1.
 Explicit or Implicit 
In a summary of the application of explicit phonetic instruction in pronunciation teaching. 
Derwing and Munrol (2005:388)
 explain
 explicit phonetic instruction as follows: 'Must as 
students
 learning
 certain grammar points benefit from being explicitly instructed to notice the 
12 
difference between their productions and those of
 LI
 speakers, so students learning L2 
pronunciation benefit from being explicitly taught phonological form to help them notice the 
difference" 
In a well-known study by Derwing, Munrol and Wiebe (1998), explicit instruction was given 
to the experimental group and not to the control group. Both groups were evaluated before and 
after the
 experiment
 by both trained and untrained listeners. The results
 demonstrated
 that 
explicit phonetic instruction enhanced learners' pronunciation of the target language. 
Luchini in his article "Task-Based Pronunciation Teaching: A State-of-the-art
 Perspective" 
argues that
 ""
 the formal instruction of those common core features of English pronunciation 
- vowel
 length,
 nuclear stress (especially contrastive stress), and
 voice
 setting - which seem to 
be vital for establishing intelligibility enable learners to take utmost advantage of
 both
 (heir 
receptive and productive pronunciation skills. "
 /"p.
 197) 
However, not all researchers agree that formal and explicit instruction can
 help students
 to 
improve their pronunciation.
 Roach,1983;
 Dalton and
 Seihofcr.
 1994: among others state that 
numerous students can not gain all the prosodic
 features
 when
 they
 arc
 overly
 taught,
 which 
can only be implicitly learnt by long-term exposure to the target
 language,
 (pi95) 
I myself believe that overt instruction is necessary in the speaking and pronunciation lessons, 
especially for my first-year English major students at Hong
 Due universitx
 because they will 
become teachers of English and they need to know
 exactK how
 a
 sound,
 a
 word,
 a
 phrase,
 an 
utterance or a sentence is pronounced, so that they can teach their pupils in the forthcoming 
luture, not just to learn pronunciation implicitly without thorough understanding of it. 
However,
 this does not mean that implicit learning is not important. Teachers should on the 
one hand give explicit phonetic instructions and on the other hand encourage students to 
continuously expose to the target language. 
13 
1.3.2. Top-down or Bottom-up 
Pronunciation teaching consists of
 2
 parts: segmental (consonants, vowels and clustering) and 
suprasegmental (thoughts group, prominence, intonation and syllable structure). Dalton & 
Scidhofcr in their book Pronunciation identify two approaches to pronunciation teaching 
including bottom-up and top-down. In bottom-up approach, the segmental features are to be 
taught first, then the suprasegmentals will naturally be gained. Whereas, in the top-down 
approach, the prosodic features are to be learnt before the
 segments,
 (pp.69-70) 
According to Celce-Murcia (2001), the top-down approach, in which suprasegmental aspects 
of pronunciation arc addressed first, has been the main trend in pronunciation leaching. Field 
(2005:20) also states that
 suprasegmentals
 should be taught first in order to improve
 learners' 
intelligibility.
 He explains that the results of numerous research have shown the
 importance
 of 
suprasegmentals over the
 segmentals.
 Moreover, segmentals arc manageable because listeners 
can use their lexical knowledge to
 interpret
 the phonemes 
In
 contrast to Celce-Murcia and Field, Levis (2005) claims that the mainstream
 emphasis
 on 
suprasegmental aspects is not entirely valid because it is not based on sound research and
 he 
points out a segmental focus makes a more important contribution to intelligibility. Saito 
(2007:20) also
 emphasizes
 the importance of teaching segmental prior to suprasegmental 
features and argues that the communication can get through if the speakers use the wrong 
prosody because the listeners can interpret what the speakers
 mean,
 but the speakers' 
mispronunciation of
 the
 sounds in minimal pairs can lead to communication disruption. 
Luchini
 (2005:195),
 however, balances these two approaches when he assumes that we should 
equilibrate between
 segmentals and suprasegmentals so that students can decide whether
 the\ 
desire to be native-like speakers or not. He goes on to argue that both segmental and 
suprasegmental features are important in making one's pronunciation intelligible. 
In
 the researcher's
 intervention, she followed the bottom-up approach in which segmental 
features were taught before suprasegmental ones. 
14 
1.4. Computers-assisted language learning (CALL) and EFL learning and teaching 
During the last decades, much CALL research has explored the potential of technology as well 
as
 multimedia—the
 combination of text, audio, video, graphics, and
 animations—as
 a tool to 
teach and reinforce English language learning. These studies focus on justifying the 
effectiveness of the application of certain technologies in specific language skill areas. 
In his recent literature review and meta-analysis, Zhao (2003) identifies three problems with 
assessing the
 effectiveness
 of technology. First is the problem of defining what counts as 
technology (videos, CALL tutorials, and chat rooms, for example, are obviously very 
different).
 The
 second
 problem is separating a technology from its particular uses.
 Because 
any given technology may be used in a variety of ways, some effective, some not, it is difficult 
to generalize about the effectiveness of a technology itself The third issue has to do with the 
effects of other
 mediating
 factors, such as
 the
 learners,
 the
 setting,
 the task(s), and
 the
 type of 
assessment.
 Zhao
 attempted
 to address
 these
 issues by performing a
 meta-analysis
 of 
stringently selected studies published between 1997 and
 2001.
 Including technologies ranging 
from video to speech recognition to web tutorials, Zhao found a significant main effect for 
technology applications on
 student
 learning. 
According to (Wood, 2001) and Nikolova (2002), multimedia is seen as supporting 
vocabulary acquisition because it can effectively present new lexical items and enable learners 
to practice them with visual
 referents
 and through gaming formats that include visual and 
auditory information, which improve retention. 
Multimedia
 technology containing audio and video has also been shown to promote the 
development
 of listening skills (Brett, 1997. Merler. 2000), and computer mediated 
communication (CMC) has also had positive effects on language acquisition (Chun, 1994; 
Warschauer, 1997). Gulcan (2003), and Hagood (2003) contend that the
 interpla\
 of 
multimedia
 elements
 improves learning to read a second language. 
15 
Stenson, Downing, Smith, & Smith
 (1992)
 hold the view that visual displays of language 
learner speech and the opportunity to visually and aurally compare output to that of a native 
speaker have been shown to improve target language pronunciation. 
In short, much recent CALL research has focused on the application of CALL in language 
teaching and research results have showed that CALL can be effectively employed to support 
and
 enhance
 language acquisition. Few, however, have focused on the application of computer 
software
 in language
 learning
 and teaching. The chief aim of this study was to justify the 
effectiveness of using computer software to teach English pronunciation to English major 
students. 
1.5. Roles of CALL software in EFL
 teaching
 and learning 
According to Kern (2006), the role of technology in CALL can
 be
 thought of in terms of
 "///c 
metaphors of
 tutor,
 tool, and
 mediufn\
 In the
 tutor role, computers can
 provide
 instruction, 
feedback, and testing in grammar, vocabulary, writing, pronunciation, and other dimensions of 
language and
 culture
 learning.
 Voice interactive CALL can also simulate
 communicative 
interaction. In the tool
 role,
 computers provide ready access to
 written,
 audio, and visual 
materials relevant to the language and culture being studied. They also provide reference tools 
such as online dictionaries, grammar and style checkers, and concordances for corpus analysis. 
The
 Internet
 and databases can serve as tools for research.
 In
 the medium role, technology 
provides
 sites for interpersonal communication, multimedia
 publication,
 distance
 learning, 
community participation, and identity formation. 
Specifically, Barr (2004) sees the roles of CALL software as follows: 
- CALL
 .software
 as a learning aid. 
Barr (2004) states that generic and specialized computer-assisted learning software have been 
used to enhance the learning capabilities of students in many areas of study, including 
language learning. Similar to Kern, Barr also regards computer software as a tutor,
 ''adopting 
the role of
 the
 teacher"
 and as a tool to develop course materials. 
16 
- CALL software as a resource for reference 
According to Barr, CALL software programs are available over the web which can also be 
directly downloaded. This give tutors the opportunity to prepare lessons using the programs 
appropriate with aims and objectives of their lessons. Similarly, students are free to browse the 
web for material or use CALL packages in their own time. 
Therefore, it can not be denied that information technology in general and CALL software in 
particular play a positive role in language learning and teaching. In other words, IT and CALL 
software enhances the process of language learning. 
1.6. Benefits of using CALL
 soft^varc
 in EFL
 teaching
 and learning 
As regards benefits of CALL software, Sciarone and Mcijcr
 (1993,
 quoted in Barr. 2004). 
suggested that
 ""(\4LL programs
 can be used for quite tedious tasks such
 a\
 /caching grammar 
and vocabulary
 acquisition''
 (p33). CALL programs will
 never
 tire, unlike human
 teachers, 
and can be used repeatedly. Barr added that when
 students
 use CALL
 packages,
 the teacher 
therefore
 has more
 time
 to
 devote
 to preparing other types of classes, concentrating on specific 
problems they may have. In addition, CALL has a certain academic value. Many modern 
programs make effective use of graphics and color and recorded sound: they are therefore eye-
catching, which make students be attracted to the programs that teach tedious areas of 
language learning. This view is further reinforced by Galavis
 (1998),
 who claimed that
 "Video, 
pictures,
 and sound presented by computers stimulate sight and hearing simultaneously in
 a 
way traditional resources do
 not''' 
Galavis goes on to state that CALL software programs may provide considerable input and a 
wide
 variety of registers and accents. They ""provide access to authentic
 materials".
 Pacoex 
(1997) also maintains that CALL software is able to offer comprehensible
 input,
 which is 
necessary for
 the
 taking place of second language learning.
 Hie
 software utilize a multi-
sensory collection of text, sound, pictures, video, animation and even hypermedia which 
provide meaningful contexts to facilitate comprehension. 
17 
As far as the researcher of this study is concerned, the benefits of using computer software in 
EFL teaching and learning are as follows: 
The first benefit for using language learning software is the great level of convenience it 
provides. The software allows students to have a language expert available when they want 
them to be. In other words, students can use CALL anywhere outside the classroom, in areas 
of self-study. 
Another major advantage is that by learning a foreign language using software, students can 
develop their own autonomy by going at the pace that suits them best and choosing the most 
appropriate learning styles and strategies. 
CALL software can also take a load of
 pressure
 off students. It can be frustrating and 
embarrassing to struggle learning a language in front of others that are learning it rather easily. 
When students learn at
 home,
 there
 is no pressure and no one to feel timid around while 
learning. 
Moreover, most of the software for language learning comes along with
 interactive
 audio 
lessons, and even speech recognition software for pronunciation. The more advanced software 
offerings
 even
 come provided with an interactive forum where students can interact with a 
particular language professional and fellow students. All these characteristics help students to 
immerse
 in
 authentic
 materials and expose to native speakers. 
It is due to these benefits of using software in language learning and teaching that the 
researcher,
 as a teacher of English of Foreign Language Department at Hong
 Due
 University. 
decided to exploit the software to teach pronunciation to her first-year English majors. 
1.7. Limitations of CALL software in EFL learning and teaching 
Beside the precious
 benefits
 that CALL programs can bring to language learning and
 teaching, 
there reveal certain limitations that teachers should take into consideration when choosing 
these programs to integrate into their lessons. 
DAI HOC
 QiJOC GIA
 HA
 NOl 
TRUNG
 TAM THONG TIN
 THiJ
 VIEN 
omj (wm 
18 
As Graham Davies points out, in his article on history of CALL, that these programs are not 
suitably spontaneous (2000). In other words, they do not yet have the ability to react to the 
unforeseen. It students do not understand the mistakes they make, the help sections that many 
CALL packages provide are limited by the information that the programmer has fed into the 
help section database. They cannot address questions that have not been pre-programmed. 
Moreover, ""it appears that CALL systems have insufficient technological capability to 
recognize and respond to the human voice" (Ehsani and Knodt,
 1998
 quoted in Barr, 2004). 
Students
 cannot yet conduct a conversation in a foreign language with a computer: human 
contact is required for this type of interaction. Galavis (1998) agrees on this fact when he 
states that computers do not provide some important features of real communicative 
exchanges as well as the sense of cooperation that can be found in class with a teacher. Lee 
(2000) also stated that there is a lack of high quality software. 
To a certain extent, these limitations can be reduced in a number of
 way.s.
 Levy
 (1997:231) 
argues that it is importance for language
 teachers
 to have a more direct
 role
 in the production 
of CALL software, thereby, ensuring the pedagogical relevance of these programs. In addition, 
all the software programs should be carefully checked before being used. 
19 
CHAPTER 2. METHODOLOGY 
2.1.
 Context of the study 
The study was conducted at Hong
 Due
 university in Thanh Hoa province. This is a multi-
discipline university in which English is one of the majors. Students at Foreign Language 
Department are trained to become teachers of English for secondary schools in Thanh Hoa. 
Teachers of English training course
 K12,
 to which the study is targeted, is in its first year in 
the academic year
 2009-2010. 
In
 the
 first
 semester,
 pronunciation is not designed as a separate subject but
 integrated
 into the 
speaking course which is delivered within
 15
 weeks with 4 periods a week. The course book 
being
 used
 is
 ""Let's
 talk /
 "
 by
 Leo
 Jones,
 Cambridge University Press 2002. 
My
 observation
 at the first and second week of the
 semester
 showed that students made many 
mistakes in their pronunciation.
 I tried
 to correct some of these mistakes.
 Iloxsever.
 students 
seemed
 so solidly stuck to their initial pronunciation that right after the
 teacher's
 feedback, 
they
 returned
 to their mistakes. Therefore. I
 decided
 to provide them with proper training 
using
 the
 software
 packages
 that arc vivid enough to
 change
 their fossilized mistakes. 
2.2.
 Arguments for the use of an action research 
""Action research is any systematic inquiry conducted by teacher researchers to gather 
information about the ways that their particular school operates, how they teach, and how 
well
 their students learn. The information is gathered with the goals of gaining insight, 
developing reflective practice, effecting positive changes in the school
 environment
 and on 
educational practices in general, and improving student outcomes. " (Mills, 2004:4) 
According to Cohen and Manion (1985), the aim of action research is to improve the current 
state of affairs within educational context in which the research is carried out. 
20 
Koshy (2005) also maintains that action research is a powerful and useful model for 
practitioner research because research can be set within a specific context or situation and 
researchers can be participants - they do not have to be distant and detached from the 
situation. 
The researcher, as a teacher, decided to choose action research as her methodology because 
action research is classroom-based research conducted by teachers in order to
 reflect
 upon and 
evolve their teaching. This meets the main purpose of my thesis, that is to gain understanding 
of teaching and learning within my own classroom and to use that knowledge to increase my 
teaching efficacy and improve my own students' pronunciation. 
2.3.
 Description of the software program 
Pronunciation Power scries consisting of 2 CD-Roms is an interactive software program that 
focuses on
 developing
 students'
 individual sounds and basic
 suprasegmental
 features. I here 
arc
 three
 areas of study for a particular sound: Lessons, Speech
 Analysis,
 and Exercises. 
Pronunciation Power
 I
 contains
 S.T.A.l.R.
 (Stress, Timing. Articulation. Intonation and pitch. 
and Rhythm) Exercises which are not
 available
 in Pronunciation Power 2. Audible sounds are 
accompanied by visual illustrations (a side and a front view) of
 real-time
 articulatory 
movements
 for the production of the sounds. For the side view, animated drawings provide an 
x-rayed look of the complete articulatory
 mechanics,
 including
 manner
 and location of 
airflow, lips and tongue placement and movement, velum movement, and whether a sound is 
voiced or
 voiceless.
 For the front view, a video clip of a real person is
 shown,
 demonstrating 
jaw, lip, and tongue protrusion movement. A written description, and at times
 suggestions,
 for 
prcxkicing
 the sound is
 provided,
 which the user can access as an auditory clip. The Speech 
Analysis offers the user a look at graphic representations of the sound utterance as a 
waveform. The user is able to record their own production of the
 sound,
 and then compare 
their
 waveform of the sound with that of the instructor. The
 waxeforms
 provide information 
concerning the loudness (amplitude) and pitch (frequenc>) of sounds, as well as duration 
(length).