Criteria cataloge
U 03.01.02
Issued by
Herr Bauer
Date of release
Juli 2001
Version
0
page
1/4
Criterion 1 - Application at resources
Assertion target
the application at resources mentioned is to be evaluated for the
proven function/activity. Under raw materials all materials are
understood, which or are processed by the described process.
The effectiveness (efficient use) of assigned resources is to be
represented and where improvement potentials are available.
Code questions A
(high)
B
(average)
C
(low)
as the application at raw
materials, etc. is effective in this
area?
From it does an optimization
potential result?
As a result of this activity
insufficient effectiveness arises
assigned raw materials, water,
energy.
There is thereby a potential of
the improvement regarding the
use.
The application at given
resources is unsatisfactory.
The process is thus still
optimizationable
in this activity is very effective
the application at resources.
After today's knowledge status
no optimization is possible
the valuation criterion is not
relevant with the practice of the
activity/function.
nr
(not relevant)
criterion 2 - loss at resources and productivity
Assertion Target
the activity is regarding producing Abwassser, exhaust air, waste,
To point out the interdependence on economic as well as
Criteria cataloge
U 03.01.02
Issued by
Herr Bauer
Date of release
Juli 2001
Version
0
page
2/4
to evaluate waste heat - again in the relation of the area.. ecological targets, in order to optimize flows regarding their "
environmental costs ".
Code questions A
(high)
B
(average)
C
(low)
as the extent at produced losses
is high, how waste water, etc.
within this area?
From it does an optimization
potential result?
As a result of this activity a high
extent at the shown features
arises within this area
it exists from it a potential of the
improvement regarding the
minimization of these factors
from this activity arises a loss as
a result of developing waste,
etc..
The process is not thus still
optimization able
by this activity arises
no/minimum loss after today's
knowledge status
no optimization possible
the valuation criterion is not
relevant with the practice of the
activity.
nr
(not relevant)
Criterion 3 – environmental-legal request
Assertion Target
the issued laws of the different environmental areas, e.g. waste
water, waste etc. are concretized by appropriate regulations,
administrative regulations and technical guidance’s. With this
criterion the observance that is to be checked and evaluated
publicly - legal specifications.
The examination whether and to what extent the existing
environmental laws and regulations are kept.
Code questions A
(high)
B
(average)
C
(low)
Criteria cataloge
U 03.01.02
Issued by
Herr Bauer
Date of release
Juli 2001
Version
0
page
3/4
legal request?
Are stricter regulations
expected?
How is the relation to the
authorities?
Do we keep our edition/limit
values?
Limit values repeatedly
easy/occasionally far exceeded
requests can not be kept with
certainty severity monitoring by
the authority
with security kept from the
authorities monitors
limit values to become
occasionally slightly exceeded
request to become essentially
with security kept
Monitored by the authorities
limit values to become
request to become kept always
with security kept
very tolerant monitoring by the
authority
the valuation criterion is not
relevant with the practice of the
activity.
nr
(not relevant)
criterion 4 - hazard potential
Assertion Ziel
this criterion considers the risk potential, which proceeds from this
activity. As potential endangerments possible risks for air, water,
are to enter soil
Possible hazard potentials uncover, in order to prevent
environmental damage, image losses and competitive
disadvantages.
Code questions A
(high)
B
(average)
C
(low)
which could occur with
abnormal or emergency
conditions? Which
environmental consequences
would be connected with it?
Substance as environmental
damaging classified
large one quantities begun
emissions are environmental-
high probability of setting free
dangerous concentrations
relative small quantities are
handled
Substance is not damaging
environment
Quantities very small
Emissions not likely
release of dangerous
Criteria cataloge
U 03.01.02
Issued by
Herr Bauer
Date of release
Juli 2001
Version
0
page
4/4
Is there an appropriate
precaution?
damaging
quantitatively highly
Handling is incorrectly
substance as precariously
regarded
concentrations or quantities very
improbably
no objection during the handling
the valuation criterion is not
relevant hardly with the practice
of the activity.
nr
(not relevant)