Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (162.87 KB, 43 trang )
<span class='text_page_counter'>(1)</span><div class='page_container' data-page=1>
PGS. TS. Nguyen Thi Ha
PGS. TS. Nguyen Thi Ha
FES- HUS
– Understand the principles of economically viable
and environmentally sound waste collection;
recycling; and treatment
– Evaluate the environmental impacts of process
technologies, especially those related to waste
collection; recycling; and treatment;
– Be capable of applying the methodology
described in the Environmental Technology
– EnTA is a qualitative tool that minimises
the need for detailed technical data;
– EnTA is designed to facilitate
multi-stakeholder dialogue leading to consensus
– EnTA is intended to be used to prevent
– EnTA is multidisciplinary – technical,
economic and environmental conditions
and processes can often be complex;
therefore many different skills are required
in assembling, combining, interpreting,
relationship between the technology and
its environment, and the consequences of
those interactions; and
– EnTA examines the environmental effects
of the entire technological system including
the resources used and the waste
i) environmental sustainability, by building in
environmental safeguards;
ii) integrity, by having the assessments
conform to agreed standards; and
and clean up costs;
• <sub>improving the environmental profile of the </sub>
company within the community and the
marketplace;
• <sub>reducing maintenance costs and </sub>
• <sub>improving overall performance; lowering </sub>
• <sub>reducing health care costs from industrial </sub>
accidents and emissions;
• avoiding high costs for pollutant spills;
planning ahead and
• <sub>better managing the environment; </sub>
related illnesses and injuries;
• reducing life risk from industrial pollutants;
• <sub>maintaining social and cultural values; </sub>
ensuring protection of the environment;
Assembling, combining, interpreting and
communicating existing knowledge from
diverse sciences, technology and policy
related disciplines for ultimate use by
i) recognizing that the “environment” is wider
than ecosystems and living resources, for
it includes economic, social, aesthetic and
cultural conditions and amenity values;
ii) adopting proactive management
approaches that emphazise problem
iii) adopting an adaptive management
approach due to uncertainties in initial
identification of potentially adverse
environmental impacts;
iv) considering the wider technological
system, rather than the technology itself,
in isolation; and
• <sub>The EIA is obligatory while EnTA is </sub>
voluntary.
• EnTA can best be used to prevent the
enterprise from reaching the stage of doing
an EIA on an unfeasible technology or
other proposal
• <sub>In its present form it does not give rise to a </sub>
framework for developing a strategy for
improving the environmental outcomes
associated with the activities of the
• <sub>The field trip was considered to be an </sub>
excellent opportunity to evaluate a real
world activity, rather than engage in EnTA
on a theoretical basis.
• <sub>EnTA is considered to be useful at the </sub>
• <sub>EnTA is viewed as a “scoping tool”, to be </sub>
used at the “idea stage”, rather than after
development of a formal or full project
proposal.
• <sub>EnTA is largely qualitative. This has </sub>
advantages in that it identifies the data
required to complete the assessment and is
more likely to be used than are assessment
methods that require large amounts of
• <sub>EnTA is an instrument that encourages a </sub>
• <sub>EnTA is an appropriate, proactive </sub>
environmental management tool that
facilitates a multidisciplinary and
multiEnvironmental sector approach to
environmental management. While it is
useful in simplifying the environmental
management issues and options of
• <sub>EnTA also fosters a comprehensive and </sub>
integrated approach, especially with regard
to the implications of the technology
system.
• <sub>EnTA identifies if more sophisticated </sub>
assessment tools, such as environmental
risk assessment and cost-benefit analysis,
need be used to ensure that the
• <sub>EnTA is not a “recipe” that has to be </sub>
followed on a rigorous basis – rather the
procedures can be modified and
supplemented, and they should evolve in
response to the process itself, and
• <sub>EnTA is a useful and appropriate tool to </sub>
facilitate dialogue between multiple
stakeholders and to gain a comprehensive
• <sub>EnTA can aid in the identification and </sub>
understanding of the issues, as a
prerequisite to an effective multistakeholder
dialogue, with the aim of bringing all
stakeholders to a common level of
understanding
• Most assessments end up as (subjective)
judgements even if they endeavour to be
objective; but there may be value in weighting
some of the categories so that there is more
benefit from aggregation of the impacts;
• The subjective character of EnTA is elevated by
its position as a tool in a multi-stakeholder
process, with a focus on education and a
• EnTA is subjective, and there is a need to either
clarify the meaning of such categories as “high,
medium and low”, or relate the terms to an
agreed base line;
• <sub>As a tool for informing, generating discussion </sub>
and advising multiple stakeholders, the
subjectivity of EnTA is not a problem;
• A key to the success of EnTA is harmonizing
• There are different roles for EnTA, depending on
a country’s level of development and the status
of environmental management in that country;
• <sub>EnTA can also be used within a company, or at </sub>
national level to facilitate a dialogue by raising
awareness and identifying key issues;
• <sub>NGOs and regulators saw EnTA as an excellent </sub>
In the ideal application of EnTA, one would need
all the lifecycle costs reflected in prices (i.e.
internalized) and all decisions could then be
made on the basis of a cost-benefit analysis; but
there are departures from the ideal:
i) all costs are not internalised;
ii) currently most technology systems are
based on not all costs being internalised – to do
so would make many of the present systems
uneconomic and redundant and;
• <sub>EnTA demonstrated how it can be used to </sub>
change a viewpoint from seeing something
as a waste to viewing it as a product;
• <sub>Should EnTA be compulsory/binding or </sub>
• EIA is not working in many Asian countries and
where it is working, it is a specialized tool in the
hands of a few regulators and consultants –
while EIA may allow industry to meet its
regulatory requirements, only EnTA can ensure
inputs from all stakeholders, and only EnTA
requires all options to be considered; and
• <sub>A key concern is to identify what is wrong with </sub>
• <sub>The start of any EnTA requires the </sub>
evaluation team to establish the
assessment framework, goals,
commitment, and resources available.
• <sub>In this phase </sub><b><sub>the tasks, responsibilities, </sub></b>
• Identifying the raw materials, land, energy,
labour, infrastructure and supporting
technologies required for the technology to
operate, and the wastes and hazardous
products produced by the technology.
• Characterizing the potential environmental and
related impacts associated with each of these
components.
• <sub>Considering the inputs and outputs over the </sub>
• <sub>Leading to an overall assessment of the </sub>
environmental risks.
• Identifying information gaps and
uncertainties
• <sub>Contributing to the decision as to whether </sub>
• <sub>An important part of EnTA is consideration </sub>
of alternative technologies that may also
achieve the same goals as the proposed
technology.
• <sub>Other technologies are considered in, in </sub>
• <sub>The fifth step is to combine all of the </sub>
previously acquired information in order to
reach a consensus as to the suitability of
the proposed technology, and any
alternatives.
• <sub>reporting the findings and </sub>
recommendations to the interested parties.
• monitoring of the use of the findings and
identifying where subsequent
assessments might be strengthened.
• In many instances the various steps in the
technology evaluation can be undertaken
simultaneously or in a different order,
depending upon the timeframe and resources
• EnTA can be an incremental and circular
process (as Figure), continually incorporating
new information, understanding and
• <sub>EnTA will be further evaluated and applied </sub>
in the domestic situation, with different
applications and approaches – e.g.
treatments, adaptation, innovation;
• <sub> Multi-sector training and consultation will </sub>
• <sub>The policy environment for the </sub>
implementation of EnTA will be developed
in the home country; and
• <sub>The tool will be refined (e.g. improve </sub>
• Actions that can be undertaken without
assistance in addition to that already
available in the course of current
employment; and
• <sub>Actions that can be undertaken only if </sub>