Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (1.88 MB, 43 trang )
<span class='text_page_counter'>(1)</span><div class='page_container' data-page=1>
William T. McGee, M.D. MHA, FCCM, FCCP
Critical Care Medicine
Associate Professor of Medicine and Surgery
University of Massachusetts
759 Chestnut Street, Springfield, MA 01199
Tel: 413-794-5439 | Fax: 413-794-3987
♦ <sub>5.16-6.11 cases/1000 persons/year</sub>
• <i><b>> 900,000 </b>episodes/yr occur in adults > 65 yrs of age</i>
• <i><b>~20% </b>require hospitalization</i>
♦ <b><sub>> 60,000 </sub></b><sub>deaths in United States in 2005</sub>
• <i>8th</i> <i><sub>most common cause of death</sub></i>
♦ <sub>30-day mortality for hospitalized pts with CAP: </sub><i><b><sub>23%</sub></b></i>
♦ <sub>Estimated annual direct medical costs of care: </sub><b><sub>$8.5 billion</sub></b>
♦ <sub>Given magnitude of antibiotic (Abx) use associated with CAP, </sub>
ensuring correct diagnosis and appropriate empiric as well as
definitive therapy for optimal course to achieve clinical cure and
reduce risk of ADEs is critical
♦ <sub>Adherence to Abx guidelines improves survival in pts with CAP</sub>
• adherence to Abx treatment guidelines is inconsistent and the
erroneous diagnosis of CAP and misuse of Abx is prevalent
♦ <b><sub>↑’</sub></b><sub>ed LOS, risk of adverse events, and emergence of resistance are </sub>
negative outcomes associated with unnecessary Abx
♦ <b><sub>Short-course therapy for CAP</sub></b><sub>: clinically as effective as </sub>
long-course therapy and associated with fewer adverse events
♦ <b><sub>IV to PO conversion</sub></b><sub>: safe at 48-72 hr, even in pts with severe </sub>
CAP, who meet criteria for clinical stability
♦ <b><sub>Biomarkers</sub></b><sub>: use to guide the need for Abx at the start of and </sub>
during therapy leads to reduced Abx exposure without
evidence of pt harm
<b>6</b>
<b>6</b>
♦ Describe pathophysiology of Procalcitonin (PCT)
♦ Describe use of PCT in diagnosis and prognosis of
severe sepsis and septic shock
<b>7</b>
♦ Characteristic that is objectively measured and
evaluated as an indicator of normal biological process,
pathogenic process, or pharmacologic response to a
therapeutic intervention
♦ Usefulness is evaluated by:
– Capacity to provide timely information beyond what is readily
available from routine physiologic and clinical data (Speed +
Accuracy)
– Sensitivity and specificity
<b>8</b>
♦ Identify patient with ↑ probability of disease, adverse
outcome, or benefit from intervention
♦ Identify presence or absence of pathologic state or
process
♦ Aid in risk stratification/prognosis
♦ Monitor response to an intervention or treatment
♦ Serve as surrogate endpoint
<b>9</b>
Sepsis is currently diagnosed using
clinical definitions combined with
Blander & Sander. <b>Beyond pattern recognition: five immune checkpoints for </b>
<b>scaling the microbial threat. </b><i>Nature Reviews Immunology</i><b>12</b>, 215-225 (March 2012)
<b>Pathogen-Associated Molecular Patterns </b>
♦ <sub>Precursor peptide of mature hormone calcitonin</sub>
♦ <sub>Released in multiple tissues in response to bacterial infections via </sub>
direct stimulation of cytokines
♦ <sub>Cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) </sub>
show fast initial spike upon infection
• <i>levels return to normal within a few hrs</i>
• <i>high variability of markers: major challenge for clinical utility</i>
♦ <sub>C-reactive protein (CRP): ↑’es slowly with peak ~ 48-72 hr</sub>
• considered biomarker for inflammation, rather than infection
♦ <sub>Increases promptly within 4-6 hrs upon stimulation and ↓’es </sub>
by ~ 50% daily if bacterial infection is controlled by immune
system and supported by effective Abx
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
PCT Level
<b>14</b>
Simon L. et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2004; 39:206-217.
Adding PCT results to clinical assessment improves the accuracy of the
early clinical diagnosis of sepsis
• PCT levels accurately differentiate sepsis from noninfectious inflammation*
• PCT has been demonstrated to be the best marker for differentiating patients with sepsis from
those with systemic inflammatory reaction not related to infectious cause
<b>15</b>
Harbarth S et.al. AM J Resp Crit Care Med. 2001; 164:396-402
• When PCT is used as a reference, the sensitivity and specificity of sepsis
diagnosis can be significantly increased compared with conventional clinical
parameters.
<b>Sensitivity: 94%</b>
<b>Specificity: 77%</b>
♦ <sub>Induced in response to microbial toxins and bacterial-induced </sub>
cytokines <i>(IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-α)</i>
• released into bloodstream where it can be measured
♦ <sub>Conversely, production attenuated by cytokines released in </sub>
response to viral infection <i>(interferon (INF)-γ)</i>
<b>17</b>
<b>17</b>
♦ How can we use this cellular signal of infection in the
management of both septic and non
septic patients
♦ Goals
– Provide antibiotic therapy to pts who need it as soon as possible
– Avoid antibiotic prescription to those without infection
♦ <sub>Helps distinguish bacterial infections from other inflammatory </sub>
reactions or viral infections
♦ <sub>Strong correlation between concentration of PCT and extent </sub>
and severity of bacterial infections has been observed in CAP
♦ <sub>102 critically ill pts with systemic infections in ICU found similar PCT </sub>
levels but lower CRP and IL-6 levels in pts treated with systemic
corticosteriods
♦ <sub>Study of 32 healthy volunteers treated with prednisolone 2 hr </sub>
before SIRS induced by injection of <i>E. coli </i>lipopolysaccharide (LPS)
• <b>PCT</b>: no inhibition within study period
• <b>Other biomarkers</b>: significantly inhibited in dose-dependant way
♦ <sub>PCT production does not rely on WBCs</sub>
• <i>Dynamics are expected to be comparable in neutropenic pts</i>
♦ <sub>Currently, different assays available for PCT with </sub>
individual performance characteristics
♦ <sub>Reasonably low detection limit especially important </sub>
when antimicrobial stewardship decisions intended
♦ <sub>Kryptor assay: lower level of detection of 0.06 àg/mL</sub>
ã <i>Based on sheep polyclonal anticalcitonin Ab</i>
• <i>Assay used in most intervention studies</i>
♦ VIDAS system from bioMerieux: equally sensitive assay
♦ <sub>Inherent complexity evaluating diagnostic capability of a novel </sub>
biomarker without presence of diagnostic reference standard
• Optimally, morphological verification such as growth of typical pathogens
or proving histopathology can be obtained to establish “correct” diagnosis
♦ <sub>Causative pathogen cannot be detected in 80% of pts with </sub>
suspected bloodstream infections
♦ <sub>> 70% of pts with radiographically confirmed PNA</sub>
• Causative microbe never identified/isolated
• Usually a syndromic definition of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs)
♦ <sub>No “gold standard” to discriminate bacterial from viral etiology</sub>
♦ <sub>Real-life concept focuses primarily on outcomes of pts with out </sub>
without Abx therapy, while discarding alleged gold standards
♦ <sub>Potential dilemma: ambiguity in deciding whether a pt who </sub>
received Abx “just to be sure” and subsequently recovers had a
good outcome because of OR despite Abx therapy
• <i>For example, self-limiting viral LRTIs will also recover despite Abx therapy</i>
♦ <sub>In sepsis and pneumonia, performance of PCT as a tool for Abx </sub>
guidance is best measured in randomized intervention trials
• <i>Assuming there was no outcome-relevant bacterial infection if the pt </i>
<i>recovers without Abx therapy</i>
♦ <sub>Similar treatment recommendation algorithms based on PCT </sub>
cutoff ranges were all used in all published stewardship studies
♦ <sub>4 classes of Abx treatment recommendations</sub>
• Strongly discouraged
• Discouraged
• Recommended
• Strongly recommended
♦ <sub>Cutoff ranges derived from multilevel likelihood calculations </sub>
obtained in observational studies
• Reflect likelihood of bacterial infection in a distinct entity of infection
♦ <sub>Initiation or continuation of Abx was more or less encouraged </sub>
when levels > 0.5 µg/mL or > 0.25 µg/mL or discouraged when
levels were < 0.1 µg/mL or < 0.25 µg/mL
♦ When Abx therapy was withheld, clinical re-evaluation and a
2nd <sub>measurement of PCT performed after 6-24 hr if clinical </sub>
condition did not improve spontaneously
♦ <sub>Specific “overruling” criteria were defined, were the algorithm </sub>
could be bypassed and Abx initiated at physician’s discretion
• <i>Namely in life-threatening disease or immediate need for ICU </i>
<i>admission because of respiratory or hemodynamic instability</i>
♦ <sub>1</sub>st <sub>intervention study testing hypothesis that PCT can be used </sub>
to guide initiation of Abx in pts with LRTI in the ED
♦ <sub>243 pts with LRTI</sub>
• Outcomes of both groups were not different
• PCT-guided group: less Abx Rx (44 vs 83%)
• Strongest effect seen in pts with acute bronchitis and exacerbated COPD
♦ <sub>2 subsequent prospective RCTs evaluating effect of PCT </sub>
guidance for Abx discontinuation in CAP and to assess pt safety
over 6-mo follow-up period in pts with exacerbated COPD
♦ <b><sub>ProCAP</sub></b><sub>: 302 pts with mostly severe CAP (>60% with PSI IV & V)</sub>
• PCT-guided therapy: Abx courses 65% shorter than in standard regimens
♦ <b><sub>ProCOLD</sub></b><sub>: 208 pts with exacerbated moderate-to-severe COPD</sub>
• PCT-guided therapy: Abx Rx’s reduced from 72% to 40% initially
• Lasting effect in follow-up period of 6-mo
• <i>Safety and Outcomes</i>: Re-exacerbation rates and FEV-1 improvement over
6-mo were same in intervention and control groups
♦ <sub>Large multicenter trial </sub>
– 6 hospitals in Switzerland with > 1300 pts
– Predefined web-based guidelines had to be followed for every pt in
control group in order to ensure optimal adherence to guidelines
♦ Abx exposure vs. treatment according to defined guidelines:
• ↓ by 32.4% in CAP; 50.4% in exacerbated COPD; 65% in acute bronchitis
♦ <sub>Overall reduction in Abx use translated into reduction in </sub>
associated side effects of ~ 30% in pts treated according to PCT
• (B) Predictive value of baseline
PCT to determine + culture
(blood, urine, respiratory)
– Positive vs. Negative culture
• 9.8ng/mL [1.7-41.3] vs.
3.3ng/mL[0.6-15.8] p<0.001
• 61% of cultures were positive
• (C) Predictive value of baseline
PCT to determine sepsis
severity
– Septic shock vs. Sepsis
• 13.6ng/mL [2.7-55.2] vs. 3.6[0.5-15.6],
p<0.001
• Baseline PCT was similar in survivors and non-survivors however there was a
significantly faster decline overtime in the serial PCT levels in survivors
• Baseline cut off of ≤ 3ng/mL excluded positive blood culture with a sensitivity of
90% (95% CI, 82-89) and a NPV of 96% (95% CI, 93-99)
• Baseline cut off of ≤ 0.1ng/mL excluded positive culture in the first 72h with a
sensitivity of 100% and NPV of 100%
♦ <sub>In 2012, all these data were pooled in large meta-analysis </sub>
using individual data of <b>4221</b> patients in 14 trials
♦ <sub>Markedly reduced Abx exposure overall</sub>
• <b>8d vs. 4d </b>and adjusted difference of <b>-3.47d </b><i>(95% CI: -3.78 to -3.17)</i>
• No increase in mortality or treatment failure
♦ <sub>Primary care setting: mainly due to ↓ Rx rates</sub> <b><sub>(23% vs. 63%)</sub></b>
• Pts with upper ARI: <b>15% vs. 48%, </b>adjusted OR: 0.14 <i>[95% CI: 0.09-0.22]</i>
• Pts with bronchitis: <b>24% vs. 66%, </b>adjusted OR: 0.15 <i>[95% CI: 0.10-0.23]</i>
♦ <sub>In ED and ICU pts, shorter courses of Abx treatment were found</sub>
• ED: <b>7d vs. 10d</b>, difference - 3.7d <i>[95% CI: - 4.09 to - 3.31]</i>
• ICU: <b>8d vs. 12d</b>, difference - 3.17d <i>[95% CI: - 4.28 to – 2.06]</i>
♦ <sub>In CAP, Abx exposure markedly shorter: </sub>
• Difference <b>– 3.34d </b><i>[95% CI: - 3.79 to – 2.88]</i>
• Associated with lower risk of treatment failure (<b>19.1% vs. 21.9% </b>in
standard treatment arm) <i>adjusted OR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.71 – 0.97</i>
♦ <sub>Timely decision making: great importance in bacterial </sub>
infections
♦ <sub>2 retrospective studies: improved mortality in pts with </sub>
CAP who received 1st <sub>dose of Abx within 4-8 hr</sub>
♦ <sub>In all intervention trials, PCT measured using rapid </sub>
sensitive assay with assay time of 20 min
• <i>Results readily available around the clock and within 1 hr</i>
♦ <sub>Key in real-life setting: strong adherence rate to PCT algorithm </sub>
to have same effect of reduced Abx exposure in clinical
practice as found in controlled studies
♦ <sub>Unlike controlled studies were adherence is monitored</sub>
• <i>Results frequently inadequately implemented in daily practice</i>
♦ <i><sub>Aujesky et al</sub></i><sub>: </sub><b><sub>37.4% </sub></b><sub>of pts with low PSI scores hospitalized</sub>
• <i>Mainly due to comorbidities</i>
• <i>Reflects difficulty of implementing guidelines into clinical practice</i>
♦ <sub>Investigated feasibility/effectiveness of PCT-guided </sub>
stewardship in real-life setting of medical clinic in Switzerland
♦ <sub>302 pts with LRTIs of all severities (64% PSI IV and V)</sub>
♦ <b><sub>73% </sub></b><sub>of pts treated according to PCT-guided algorithm</sub>
• Abx therapy applied in <b>71% </b>of pts
• Median duration of treatment: <b>6d</b>
• Significant improvement when compared to control group from
previous trial at same hospital (ProHOSP)
♦ <sub>Study of 1759 pts in US, France, Switzerland</sub>
♦ <sub>Overall adherence to PCT-guided stewardship in 68% pts</sub>
• Adherence: acute bronchitis (81%); exacerbated COPD (70%); CAP (64%)
• Outpatient setting (86%) vs. Inpatient setting (66%)
♦ <sub>After multivariate adjustment, significantly shorter Abx </sub>
exposure demonstrated with PCT algorithm
• <b>5.9d vs. 7.4d</b>; difference – 1.51d <i>[95% CI: - 2.04 to – 0.98]</i>
♦ <i><sub>No increase in risk of combined adverse outcome end point within </sub></i>
<i>30d of follow-up in respect to withholding Abx and early cessation</i>
<b>Procalcitonin Group (n =</b>
<b>3336)</b>
<b>Control Group (n = 3372)</b> <b>Between-Group Difference (95%</b>
<b>CI)</b> <b><sub>Adjusted OR (95% CI)</sub><sub>a</sub></b>
<b>P</b>
<b>Value</b>
<b>Clinical Outcomes</b>
<b>30-d mortality, No. (%)</b> 286 (8.6) 336 (10.0) 0.83 (0.70 to 0.99) <b>.04</b>
<b>Treatment failure, No. (%)b</b> 768 (23.0) 841 (24.9) 0.90 (0.80 to 1.01) <b>.07</b>
<b>Length of ICU stay, median (IQR), d</b> 8.0 (4.0 to 17.0) 8.0 (4.0 to 17.0) 0.39 (−0.81 to 1.58) <b>.52</b>
<b>Length of hospital stay, median (IQR), d</b> 8.0 (2.0 to 17.0) 8.0 (2.0 to 17.0) −0.19 (−0.96 to 0.58) <b>.63</b>
<b>Antibiotic-related adverse effects, No./total (%)</b> 247/1513 (16.3) 336/1521 (22.1) 0.68 (0.57 to 0.82) <b>.001</b>
<b>Antibiotic Exposure</b>
<b>Rates for initiation of antibiotics, No./total (%)</b> 2351/3288 (71.5) 2894/3353 (86.3) 0.27 (0.24 to 0.32) <b>.001</b>
<b>Duration of antibiotics, median (IQR), d</b> 6.0 (4.0 to 10.0) 8.0 (6.0 to 12.0) −1.83 (−2.15 to −1.50) <b>.001</b>
♦ <sub>Evidence supports PCT as accurate surrogate biomarker for </sub>
likelihood and severity of bacterial infections
♦ <sub>In CAP and other respiratory infections, PCT-guided algorithms </sub>
resulted in ↓’ed Abx exposure
• Maintaining similar or better level of safety compared with standard care
♦ <sub>Reductions in Abx use translate to decreased:</sub>
• Costs, risk of side effects, and bacterial resistance
♦ <b>Short-course therapy for CAP</b>: clinically as effective as
long-course therapy and associated with fewer adverse
events
♦ <b>IV to PO conversion</b>: safe at 48-72 hr, even in pts with
severe CAP, who meet criteria for clinical stability
♦ <b>Procalcitonin</b>: use to guide the need for Abx at the start
of therapy leads to reduced Abx exposure without