THE FIRST NATIONAL ULTRASOUND
CONFERENCE
THE UPDATE: ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND IN
THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF
GASTROENTEROLOGY DISEASES
Prof.Tran Van Huy - Dr.Vinh Khanh
Department of Internal Medicine - Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy
OBJECTIVES
1
1
Overview of endoscopic ultrasound
2
The role of EUS in the diagnosis
3
The role of EUS in the treatment
2
3
5 4
Conclusion
6
hinhanhykhoa.com
OBJECTIVES
1
1
Overview of endoscopic ultrasound
2
The role EUS in the diagnosis
3
The role EUS in the treatment
2
3
5 4
6
Conclusion
ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND
The way to progress
1st TTS EUS Probe (1976)
• Integrated EUS scopes (1980)
• Single frequency scopes (1980)
• Variable frequency scopes (1985)
• 1st EUS – FNA (1991)
• Color Doppler
• 1st EUS guided cholangiography (1996)
• Large Channel Scopes
• 1st EUS guided CD-stomy (2002)
Interventional Endosonography (2017)
hinhanhykhoa.com
ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND
Radial
For diagnosis
Linear
Diagnosis and intervention
Mini probe
12MHz – 20 MHz
RADIAL - LINEAR
Radial EUS
L
Imaging
perpendicular to the
endoscope
Linear EUS
L
Imaging parallel to
the endoscope
GI Atlas, Wiley
hinhanhykhoa.com
Radial EUS
Linear EUS
OBJECTIVES
1
1
Overview of endoscopic ultrasound
2
The role of EUS in the diagnosis
3
The role of EUS in the treatment
2
3
5 4
Conclusion
6
hinhanhykhoa.com
hinhanhykhoa.com
1. SUBMUCOSA TUMORS
hinhanhykhoa.com
1. SUBMUCOSA TUMORS
•
Approximately 1 in 300 patients.
•
Diagnosed by endoscopy.
•
EUS: location, layer, size, contour, echogenicity, vascularity.
- Follow up
- Accuracy: 90%.
1.
2.
Alexander J. Eckardt, Christian Jenssen (2015), Current endoscopic ultrasound-guided approach to incidental subepithelial lesions: optimal or optional?, Annals
of Gastroenterology 28, 1-13.
Hwang JH1, Saunders MD, Rulyak SJ, et al. A prospective study comparing endoscopy and EUS in the evaluation of GI subepithelial masses. Gastrointest
Endosc 2005;62:202-208.
1.Kazuya Akahoshi (2012),Practical Handbook of Endoscopic Ultrasonography.
hinhanhykhoa.com
SUBMUCOSA TUMORS
CYST
2. GASTROINTESTINAL CANCER
EUS
Prognosis
Observe of
chemoradiotherapy
Staging
hinhanhykhoa.com
THE ROLE OF EUS IN TMN
STAGING
N
EUS - FNA
T
M
Accuracy: 7492%
TMN
ACCURACY OF EUS v. CT BY STAGE
OF ESOPHAGEAL CANCER
Staging Accuracy (%)
100
80
60
40
20
0
EUS
T1 or T2
CT
T3
T4
N0
N1
hinhanhykhoa.com
ACCURACY OF EUS v. CT IN THE
STAGING OF GASTRIC CANCER
90
80
85
78
70
60
48
50
42
40
30
20
10
0
T STAGE
N STAGE
EUS
CT
ESOPHAGUS CANCER
T3N1Mx
hinhanhykhoa.com
3. COMMON BILE DUCT STONE
Ultrasound
ERCP
CT-Scanner
DIAGNOSIS
EUS
MRCP
EUS v. MRCP IN THE DIAGNOSIS CBDs
Sensitivity
Specificity
Positive
predictive value
Negative
predictive value
Accuracy
EUS (%)
MRCP (%)
100EUS
95,4
100%
90,9
95.4%
100
RCP
72,7
62,5
90.9%
100100%
96.9%
100
96,9
82,2
De Ledinghen V GIE 1999
hinhanhykhoa.com
4. CHRONIC PANCREATITIS
Morphology
Function
Early
chronic
pancreatitis
Difficulties
Chronic
pancreatitis
hinhanhykhoa.com
DIAGNOSIS OF CHRONIC
PANCREATITIS
Diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis on EUS
Conventional classification
Rosemont classification
Rosemont classification detect early chronic pancreatitis.