ĐÁP án THI IELTS NGÀY 17 08 2013
Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (156.22 KB, 2 trang )
ĐÁP ÁN THI IELTS NGÀY 17-08-2013
Task 2: In some countries, students have to pay their own college and university
fees, but in other countries, government pays.
Do the advantages of government spending their money on college and university
fees for student outweigh the disadvantages?
Pros of freeing:
- High skilled labor
- Equal right for all
Cons:
- Waste of money
- Lack of seriousness in learning
- Hardly achieve good results
- Put more pressure on governments and teachers and schools
Other solutions
- Provide scholarships
Word count: 421
Timing: 15 minutes
Whether governments should be wholly responsible for university fees remains
controversial. Some people think that by doing this, governments can encourage all
people to enhance their education while others claim that it is a huge waste of
money for them. In my view, disadvantages of freeing education outweigh
advantages of this policy
First, it is claimed that education is the right of every person. Hence, he or she is
entitled to reach higher level of education without payment. However, if
governments free education as an equal right, all other fields like health-care will
demand the same right. Therefore, no sooner does this policy come true than all
services in the society are on the house, leaving no profit for workers in each field
to earn a living, let alone dig deeper into their fields. In such countries where
education is a service and students are obliged to pay fee, schools have enough fee
to maintain facilities and hire the best teachers to educate. As a result, they can
produce the most outstanding students like Havard and Yale Universities which
demand high fees, but offer reputed training.
Second, this policy is conducive to the creation of high-skilled labor. With each
citizens receiving higher education like tertiary, governments are proud with their
best workers to produce the highest quality products and achieve significant
economic growth. Nevertheless, because of being exempt from education fees,
students take knowledge for granted, which leads to their lower academic
performance. In addition, while governments are supposed to shoulder a variety of
tasks from diseases, defense to political relationship, it will be burdensome for
them to be totally in charge of education without sharing of each citizen.
Furthermore, although people claim that poor, but outstanding students may have
little access to higher education, which is a disadvantage to the society in the long
term, governments can provide scholarships and grants for these special
individuals. This means that being totally free from education expense is
unnecessary. Equally important, for students who are responsible for education
fees, they will be actively motivated to work part-time jobs to pay for their higher
education whereas they accumulate a variety of living skills from economic
independence, seriousness in learning to time-management.
In brief, there are more pains than gains in
from university education fees. By paying
serious in learning, enhance several skills,
salaries to sharpen their teaching ability and
numerous social tasks.
the policy of emancipating students
fees, not only do students become
but teachers are also given higher
governments are less burdened with
