Foreign Exchange Hedging Strategies at General Motors Critique
Luke Bennrubi
Britten Feldman
Hillary Felice
Drew Ferwalt
Overview
❏
Review important topics
❏
Discuss material covered well
❏
Cover material missed
GM Hedging Policies
q
q
q
q
Commercial (Operating) Exposure: Volatile currencies
are hedged for only 6 months and risk threshold
lowered to $5 million from $10 million
Commercial (Capital) Exposure: Amounts in excess of
$1 million not $10 million (typo)
Accounting Policies: Held gains and losses from
hedging in shareholder’s equity account
Reporting: Hedging activities closely tracked; policy lead
to passive switch
GM Hedging Policy Objectives
❏
Reduce cash flow and earnings volatility
❏
Minimize the management time and costs dedicated to global FX management
❏
Align FX management in a manner consistent with how GM operates its automotive business
Passive vs. Active Hedging
❏ Currency exposure is inevitable when doing
business in foreign markets
❏ Passive Hedging
❏ Uses forward/options contracts (0-100%)
❏ Protects against exchange rate volatility
❏ Active Hedging
❏ Managers exploit inefficiencies in market
❏ Fundamental, technical, dynamic, option-based
“The second objective was a consequence of an internal study that determined
that investment of resources in active FX (foreign exchange) management had
not resulted in significant outperformance of passive benchmarks.”
Transactional Exposure
❏ Definition: Gains and losses when transactions
are settled in currency other than reporting
currency
❏ Stem from many different things
❏
❏
❏
Buying activities
Selling activities
Financing decisions (borrowing)
Translational Exposures
❏
❏
❏
Definition: Gains and losses that arise when assets and liabilities are translated back into
reporting currency
Determined by functional currency
GM does not hedge translational exposures
❏
Generally not large enough
❏
When large enough, senior finance executives
are notified