Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (654.8 KB, 19 trang )
<span class="text_page_counter">Trang 2</span><div class="page_container" data-page="2">
<i><small>The 2 International Conference on Advanced Technology & Sustainable Development (ICATSD 2022) </small></i>
<i><small>International Symposium on Sustainable Development in Transition Economies (ISSDTE 2022)</small></i>
<i><small>The 2 International Conference on Advanced Technology & Sustainable Development (ICATSD 2022) </small></i>
<i><small>International Symposium on Sustainable Development in Transition Economies (ISSDTE 2022)</small></i>
<i><small>The 2 International Conference on Advanced Technology & Sustainable Development (ICATSD 2022) </small></i>
<i><small>The 2 International Conference on Advanced Technology & Sustainable Development (ICATSD 2022) </small></i>
NAM HAI LE<small>1</small>, TUAN LOC LE<small>2</small>, MINH TUAN NGUYEN<small>3 </small>
<i>Ho Chi Minh University of Banking </i>
<i>, , </i>
consumption, as well as environmentally friendly products and services right from production to consumption. This study investigates the relationship of four constructs, namely consumer social responsibility (CnSR), perceived quality (PQ), trust in producers (TRP), and repurchase intention (RPI) when consuming organic food. A combination of qualitative research and quantitative research (survey) was used to gain the research objectives. The data quantitative was collected from a sample of 494 organic food consumers in an emerging market economy, i.e., Vietnam. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was applied to analyze and test suggested hypotheses in the research model. The finding indicates that consumer social responsibility has a positive effect on perceived quality, trust in producers, and repurchase intention. Moreover, perceived quality and trust in producers also significantly impact repurchase intention. The result also suggests important implications for organic food producers and marketers to increase the consumption of this food in Viet Nam.
The trend of organic food consumption and this food’s interest are increasing in many different countries around the world. The value of the global organic food and beverage market reaches $188.35 billion (Grand View Research, 2022a). Forecasted revenue reaches USD 564.22 billion by 2030 (Grand View Research, 2022b). Previous studies related to organic food consumption behavior have been conducted in both developed and developing countries, such as in Turkey (Demirtas, 2019), in USA (Shin et al., 2019), in France (Ladwein & Sánchez Romero, 2021), in Romani (Fleseriu et al., 2020), in Turkey, Pakistan, Iran (Asif et al., 2018), in India (Nagaraj, 2021; Tandon et al., 2020), in Tanzania and Kenya (Wang et al., 2019) and in Viet Nam (Le-Anh & Nguyen-To, 2020; Pham et al., 2018). Most of these studies focus on purchase intention or willingness to buy. In contrast, there is little study on repurchase intention toward organic food in Viet Nam - emerging market economy.
Furthermore, consumers are paying more and more attention to their food choices because of sustainability (De Canio & Martinelli, 2021). Organic food is known as high-quality food, eco-friendly food because of its outstanding attributes, such as lack of preservatives, free of artificial chemicals, antibiotics, and hormones (Misra & Singh, 2016; Paul & Rana, 2012; Rana & Paul, 2017). So, when consumers buy organic food or re-buying, they tend to show their responsibility for environmental impact known as consumer social responsibility (Quazi et al., 2016). There is also a strong link between Consumer social responsibility (CnSR) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) (Gómez-Corona, 2020; Vitell, 2015). And the environmental aspect of social responsibility is often overlooked (Rashid et al., 2014).
In addition, the role of trust in the organic food purchasing process is demonstrated in previous publications. Accordingly, trust relates to willingness to pay for this food (Da Cunha et al., 2019; Konuk, 2020; Tung et al., 2012); trust has a positive relationship with purchase intention (Konuk, 2018). However, all the mentioned research has focused on product characteristics and performance. Few studies focus on
</div><span class="text_page_counter">Trang 9</span><div class="page_container" data-page="9"><i><small>International Symposium on Sustainable Development in Transition Economies (ISSDTE 2022)</small></i>
stakeholder trust such as trust toward organic milk producers in Italy (Carfora et al., 2019). In Viet Nam, the role of trust in the producers in the organic food supply chain is also not fully provided. Hamzaoui-Essoussi et al. (2013) also suggest that it is essential to take into account different market structures, trust, as well as different food cultures. Hence, it is crucial to study the effect of trust in organic food producers on repurchase intention, especially in emerging market as Viet Nam.
So, the following research objectives are formulated:
RO1. Examining the effect of consumer social responsibility on perceived quality, trust in producers, and repurchase intention for organic food.
RO2. Examining the impact of perceived quality on repurchase intention for organic food. RO3. Examining the influence of trust in producers on repurchase intention for organic food. RO4. Providing recommendations to increase repurchase intention for organic food.
Based on the theory of planned behavior (Ajzen, 1991) along with the cue utilization theory proposed by Olson (1972), and the Commitment-Trust theory of Morgan & Hunt (1994), this study examines the relationship of four constructs, including consumer social responsibility (CnSR), perceived quality (PQ), trust in producers (TRP), and Repurchase intention (RPI). These relationships are discussed as follows:
<i><b>Consumer social responsibility (CnSR) and its relationship with perceived quality (PQ), Trust in producers (TRP), and Repurchase intention (RPI) </b></i>
In the study of Muncy & Vitell (1992), consumer social responsibility (CnSR) is understood as “the moral principles and standards” regarding the possession, use, and disposal of products by individuals. Similarly, Devinney et al. (2006) consider consumer social responsibility as “the conscious and deliberate choice to make certain consumption choices based on personal and moral beliefs”. Webster Jr (1975) focuses on the “social aspect” when referring to consumers' consciousness in considering the impact of selected products. Whereas several definitions of consumer social responsibility deal with the “environmental aspect” indicated in previous publications such as Antil (1984), Fisk (1973), and Straughan & Roberts (1999). Quazi et al. (2016) refer to the choice of ‘‘the right things to do’’ toward the individual’s stakeholders as an important attribute of consumer social responsibility. In summary, consumer social responsibility demonstrates their consciousness when choosing eco-friendly products. (Schlaile et al., 2018).
Organic food has produced with organic agricultural practices. That means chemical fertilizers, pesticides, or toxic preservatives are not used in the production process (Paul & Rana, 2012; Rana & Paul, 2017). So, organic food is rated healthier than other conventional foods (Williams & Hammitt, 2001). At the same time, consumption of organic food is understood as responsible consumption behaviors because it is friendly to the environment (Yadav et al., 2019; Yadav & Pathak, 2016). From the above discussion, this study focuses on the environmental impact aspect of consumer social responsibility when carried out. The more environmentally conscious or consumption-conscious consumers are, the more high-quality foods they are interested in such as organic foods. The role of social responsibility of consumers has been tested in green purchase behavior (Rejikumar, 2016) and organic food purchase behavior (Singh & Alok, 2021). Moreover, consumer social responsibility has a strong relationship with repurchase behavior.
Based on these discussions, the following hypotheses are proposed:
H1: Consumer social responsibility has a positive impact on perceived quality for organic food. H2: Consumer social responsibility has a positive impact on trust in organic producers.
H3: Consumer social responsibility has a positive impact on repurchase intention for organic food.
<i><b>Perceived quality (PQ) and Repurchase intention (RPI) </b></i>
Perceived quality is defined as “the consumer's judgment about a product's overall excellence or superiority” (Zeithaml, 1988). Based on the cue utilization theory proposed by Olson (1972), Richardson et al. (1994) indicate that products consist of an array of cues, namely extrinsic cues, and intrinsic cues. Consumers use them to evaluate the product quality. Relating to organic food consumption, intrinsic cues refer to the physical properties of the product such as taste, smell, and freshness. Whereas price and packaging are known to be external attributes of the product. In this research, perceived quality is one of the cues evaluated by consumers when purchasing. Furthermore, the influence of perceived quality on repurchase intention has also been demonstrated (De Toni et al., 2018; Ting et al., 2018). Hence, the following hypothesis is suggested:
</div><span class="text_page_counter">Trang 10</span><div class="page_container" data-page="10"><i><small>The 2 International Conference on Advanced Technology & Sustainable Development (ICATSD 2022) </small></i>
<b>H4: Perceived quality has a positive impact on repurchase intention for organic food. </b>
<i><b>Trust in producers (TRP) and Repurchase intention (RPI) </b></i>
In the Commitment-Trust theory, trust is established when one party believes that the partner has reliability and integrity (Morgan & Hunt, 1994). Regarding organic food consumption, trust refers to customers' confidence in the properties of food, or their confidence in stakeholders, such as producers, retailers, farmers, or other organizations. In the previous researches, the role of trust has been proved such as trust in retailers (Khare & Pandey, 2017; Pandey & Khare, 2017; Steffen & Doppler, 2018), trust in organic food (Konuk, 2018), and trust in organic production (Da Cunha et al., 2019). In the food field, consumers trust can be built in a variety of ways. Accordingly, trust is formed from the relationship between the parties not only in the food production process but also in the distribution process (Zhang et al., 2016). With the diversified development of sales channels, direct sales are also chosen by producers. Therefore, increasing trust as well as strengthening relationships between producers and customers is very necessary to promote the consumption of organic food. At the same time, Hamzaoui-Essoussi et al. (2013) indicates that “trust is a determinant of consumers' choices, not only of the type of organic product but also of the type of distribution channel”. Therefore, hypothesis H5 is proposed in this study:
H5: Trust in producers has a positive impact on repurchase intention for organic food. The research model is proposed as follows (Figure 1)
<small>Figure 1. The proposed research model </small>
To gain those set-out research objectives, the study mixed qualitative and quantitative approaches (Johnson et al., 2007). This combination is also known as the mixed method. Using mixed methods research is considered an efficient way to harness strengths that offset the weaknesses of both quantitative and qualitative research (Creswell & Clark, 2017). In particular, to adjust and clarify the statements, six candidates were selected for focus group discussion. All of the participants had experience in organic food consumption for at least one year. The results of the qualitative research step showed that 22 items of official scales were established. Next, a self-Administered Questionnaire was designed to collect quantitative data. Through snowball sampling, data from 494 people who had experience consuming organic food were used to analyze.
The items of each variable were adjusted based on the previous studies and the actual situation of this study through qualitative research. All of them were evaluated via a 5-point Likert scale. Firstly, consumer social responsibility was measured using a five-item scale adopted from the study of Quazi et al. (2016). Secondly, the trust in producers was measured using a seven-item scale adjusted from the study of De Jonge et al. (2007), Ladwein & Sánchez Romero (2021) and focus group discussion. Exploring perceived quality with five items adopted from De Toni et al. (2018). Finally, the repurchase intention was formed with five items from the previous studies of Mittal et al. (1998); Wu et al. (2014) and focus group discussion.
</div>