Tải bản đầy đủ (.pdf) (11 trang)

Báo cáo hóa học: " Research Article Existence and Uniqueness of Solutions for Singular Higher Order Continuous and Discrete Boundary " doc

Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (498.94 KB, 11 trang )

Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Boundary Value Problems
Volume 2008, Article ID 123823, 11 pages
doi:10.1155/2008/123823
Research Article
Existence and Uniqueness of Solutions for
Singular Higher Order Continuous and Discrete
Boundary Value Problems
Chengjun Yuan,
1, 2
Daqing Jiang,
1
and You Zhang
1
1
School of Mathematics and Statistics, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, Jilin, China
2
School of Mathematics and Computer, Harbin University, Harbin 150086, Heilongjiang, China
Correspondence should be addressed to Chengjun Yuan,
Received 4 July 2007; Accepted 31 December 2007
Recommended by Raul Manasevich
By mixed monotone method, the existence and uniqueness are established for singular higher-order
continuous and discrete boundary value problems. The theorems obtained are very general and
complement previous known results.
Copyright q 2008 Chengjun Yuan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative
Commons Attribution License, which p ermits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in
any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Introduction
In recent years, the study of higher-order continuous and discrete boundary value problems
has been studied extensively in the literature see 1–17 and their references. Most of the
results told us that the equations had at least single and multiple positive solutions.


Recently, some authors have dealt with the uniqueness of solutions for singular higher-
order continuous boundary value problems by using mixed monotone method, for example,
see 6, 14, 15. However, there are few works on the uniqueness of solutions for singular dis-
crete boundary value problems.
In this paper, we state a unique fixed point theorem for a class of mixed monotone op-
erators, see 6, 14, 18. In virtue of the theorem, we consider the existence and uniqueness
of solutions for the following singular higher-order continuous and discrete boundary value
problems 1.1 and 1.2 by using mixed monotone method. We first discuss the existence and
uniqueness of solutions for the following singular higher-order continuous boundary value
problem
y
n
tλqtgyhy0, 0<t<1,λ>0,
y
i
0y
n−2
10, 0 ≤ i ≤ n − 2,
1.1
2 Boundary Value Problems
where n ≥ 2, qt ∈ C0, 1, 0, ∞, g : 0, ∞ → 0, ∞ is continuous and nondecreasing;
h : 0, ∞ → 0, ∞ is continuous and nonincreasing, and h may be singular at y  0.
Next, we consider the existence and uniqueness of solutions for the following singular
higher-order discrete boundary value problem
Δ
n
yiλqin−1gyin−1 hyin−1  0,i∈ N  {0, 1, 2, ,T − 1},λ>0,
Δ
k
y0Δ

n−2
yT  10, 0 ≤ k ≤ n − 2,
1.2
where n ≥ 2, N

 {0, 1, 2, ,Tn}, qi ∈ CN

, 0, ∞, g : 0, ∞ → 0, ∞ is continuous
and nondecreasing; h : 0, ∞ → 0, ∞ is continuous and nonincreasing, and h may be
singular at y  0. Throughout this paper, the topology on N

will be the discrete topology.
2. Preliminaries
Let P be a normal c one of a Banach space E,ande ∈ P with e≤1,e
/
 θ. Define
Q
e
 {x ∈ P | x
/
 θ, there exist constants m, M > 0 such that me ≤ x ≤ Me}. 2.1
Now we give a definition see 18.
Definition 2.1 see 18. Assume A : Q
e
× Q
e
→ Q
e
. A is said to be mixed monotone if Ax, y
is nondecreasing in x and nonincreasing in y,thatis,ifx

1
≤ x
2
x
1
,x
2
∈ Q
e
 implies Ax
1
,y ≤
Ax
2
,y for any y ∈ Q
e
,andy
1
≤ y
2
y
1
,y
2
∈ Q
e
 implies Ax, y
1
 ≥ Ax, y
2

 for any x ∈ Q
e
.
x

∈ Q
e
is said to be a fixed point of A if Ax

,x

x

.
Theorem 2.2 see 6, 14. Suppose that A: Q
e
× Q
e
→ Q
e
is a mixed monotone operator and ∃
a constant α, 0 ≤ α<1, such that
A

tx,
1
t
y

≥ t

α
Ax, y,forx,y∈ Q
e
, 0 <t<1. 2.2
Then A has a unique fixed point x

∈ Q
e
. Moreover, for any x
0
,y
0
 ∈ Q
e
× Q
e
,
x
n
 A

x
n−1
,y
n−1

,y
n
 A


y
n−1
,x
n−1

,n 1, 2, , 2.3
satisfy
x
n
−→ x

,y
n
−→ x

, 2.4
where


x
n
− x



 o

1 − r
α
n


,


y
n
− x



 o

1 − r
α
n

, 2.5
0 <r<1, r is a constant from x
0
,y
0
.
Theorem 2.3 see 6, 14, 18. Suppose that A: Q
e
× Q
e
→ Q
e
is a mixed monotone operator and ∃ a
constant α ∈ 0, 1 such that 2.2 holds. If x


λ
is a unique solution of equation
Ax, xλx, λ>02.6
in Q
e
,thenx

λ
− x

λ
0
→0,λ→ λ
0
. If 0 <α<1/2, then 0 <λ
1

2
implies x

λ
1
≥ x

λ
2
, x

λ

1
/
 x

λ
2
,and
lim
λ→∞


x

λ


 0, lim
λ→0



x

λ


∞. 2.7
Chengjun Yuan et al. 3
3. Uniqueness positive solution of differential equations 1.1
This section discusses singular higher-order boundary value problem 1.1. Throughout this

section, we let Gt, s be the Green’s function to −y

 0,y0y10, we note that
Gt, s



t1 − s, 0 ≤ t ≤ s ≤ 1,
s1 − t, 0 ≤ s ≤ t ≤ 1,
3.1
and one can show that
Gt, tGs, s ≤ Gt, s ≤ Gt, t, for Gt, s ≤ Gs, s, t, s ∈ 0, 1 × 0, 1. 
3.2
Suppose that y is a positive solution of 1.1.Let
xty
n−2
t, 3.3
from y
i
0y
n−2
10, 0 ≤ i ≤ n−2, and Taylor Formula, we define operator T : C
2
0, 1 →
C
n
0, 1,by
ytTxt

t

0
t − s
n−3
n − 3!
xsds, for 3 ≤ n,
ytTxtxt, for n  2
3.4
Then we have
x
2
tλft, Txt  0, 0 <t<1,λ>0,
x0x10.
3.5
Then from 3.4, we have the next lemma.
Lemma 3.1. If xt is a solution of 3.5,thenyt is a solution of 1.1.
Further, if yt is a solution of 1.1,implythatxt is a solution of 3.5.
Let P  {x ∈ C0, 1 | xt ≥ 0, for all t ∈ 0, 1
}. Obviously, P is a normal cone of Banach
space C0, 1.
Theorem 3.2. Suppose that there exists α ∈ 0, 1 such that
gtx ≥ t
α
gx, 3.6
h

t
−1
x

≥ t

α
hx, 3.7
for any t ∈ 0, 1 and x>0,andq ∈ C0, 1, 0, ∞ satisfies

1
0

s
n−1
n − 2s

−α
qsds < ∞. 3.8
Then 1.1 has a unique positive solution y

λ
t. And moreover, 0 <λ
1

2
implies y

λ
1
≤ y

λ
2
,y


λ
1
/
 y

λ
2
.
If α ∈ 0, 1/2,then
lim
λ→0



y

λ


 0, lim
λ→∞


y

λ


∞. 3.9
4 Boundary Value Problems

Proof. Since 3.7  holds, let t
−1
x  y, one has
hy ≥ t
α
hty. 3.10
Then
hty ≤
1
t
α
hy, for t ∈ 0, 1,y>0. 3.11
Let y  1. The above inequality is
ht ≤
1
t
α
h1, for t ∈ 0, 1. 3.12
From 3.7, 3.11,and3.12, one has
h

t
−1
x

≥ t
α
hx,h

1

t

≥ t
α
h1,htx ≤
1
t
α
hx,ht ≤
1
t
α
h1, for t ∈ 0, 1,x>0.
3.13
Similarly, from 3.6, one has
gtx ≥ t
α
gx,gt ≥ t
α
g1, for t ∈ 0, 1,x>0. 3.14
Let t  1/x, x > 1, one has
gx ≤ x
α
g1, for x ≥ 1. 3.15
Let etGt, tt1 − t, and we define
Q
e


x ∈ C0, 1 |

1
M
Gt, t ≤ xt ≤ MGt, t,t∈ 0, 1

, 3.16
where M>1 is chosen such that
M>max


λg1

1
0
qsds  λh1

1
0

s
n−1
n − 2s
n!

−α
qsds

1/1−α
,

λg1


1
0
Gs, s

s
n−1
n − 2s
n!

α
qsds  λh1

1
0
Gs, sqsds

−1/1−α

.
3.17
First, from 3.4 and 3.16, for any x ∈ Q
e
,wehavethefollowing.
When 3 ≤ n,
1
M
t
n−1
n − 2t

n!


t
0
1
M
Gs, s
t − s
n−3
n − 3!
ds ≤ Txt


t
0
MGs, s
t − s
n−3
n − 3!
ds ≤ M
t
n−1
n − 2t
n!
≤ M, for t ∈ 0, 1,
3.18
Chengjun Yuan et al. 5
when n  2,
1

M
t
n−1
n − 2t
n!
≤ Txtxt ≤ M
tn − 2t
n!
≤ M, for t ∈ 0, 1, 3.19
then
1
M
t
n−1
n − 2t
n!
≤ Txt ≤ M
t
n−1
n − 2t
n!
≤ M, for t ∈ 0, 1. 3.20
For any x, y ∈ Q
e
, we define
A
λ
x, ytλ

1

0
Gt, sqsgTxs  hTysds, for t ∈ 0, 1. 3.21
First, we show that A
λ
: Q
e
× Q
e
→ Q
e
.
Let x, y ∈ Q
e
, from 3.14, 3.15,and3.20,wehave
gTxt ≤ gM ≤ M
α
g1, for t ∈ 0, 1, 3.22
and from 3.13,wehave
hTyt ≤ h

1
M
t
n−1
n − 2t
n!



t

n−1
n − 2t
n!

−α
h

1
M

≤ M
α

t
n−1
n − 2t
n!

−α
h1, for t ∈ 0, 1.
3.23
Then, from 3.2, 3.21, 3.22 and 3.23,wehave
On the other hand, for any x, y ∈ Q
e
,from3.13 and 3.14,wehave
gTxt ≥ g

1
M
t

n−1
n − 2t
n!



t
n−1
n − 2t
n!

α
g

1
M



t
n−1
n − 2t
n!

α
1
M
α
g1,
hTyt ≥ hMh


1
1/M


1
M
α
h1, for t ∈ 0, 1.
3.24
Thus, from 3.2, 3.21 and 3.24,wehave
A
λ
x, yt
≥ λGt, t


1
0
Gs, sqsM
−α

s
n−1
n − 2s
n!

α
g1ds 


1
0
Gs, sqsM
−α
h1ds

1
M
Gt, t, for t ∈ 0, 1.
3.25
So, A
λ
is well defined and A
λ
Q
e
× Q
e
 ⊂ Q
e
.
6 Boundary Value Problems
Next, for any l ∈ 0, 1, one has
A
λ

lx, l
−1
y


tλ

1
0
Gt, sqs

glTxs  h

l
−1
Tys

ds
≥ λ

1
0
Gt, sqs

l
α
gTxs  l
α
hTys

ds
 l
α
A
λ

x, yt, for t ∈ 0, 1.
3.26
So the conditions of Theorems 2.2 and 2.3 hold. Therefore, there exists a unique x

λ
∈ Q
e
such that A
λ
x

,x

x

λ
. It is easy to check that x

λ
is a unique positive solution of 3.5 for
given λ>0. Moreover, Theorem 2.3 means that if 0 <λ
1

2
, then x

λ
1
t ≤ x


λ
2
t, x

λ
1
t
/
 x

λ
2
t
and if α ∈ 0, 1/2,then
lim
λ→0



x

λ


 0, lim
λ→∞


x


λ


∞. 3.27
Next, from Lemma 3.1 and 3.4,wegetthaty

λ
 Tx

λ
is a unique positive solution
of 1.1 for given λ>0. Moreover, if 0 <λ
1

2
, then y

λ
1
t ≤ y

λ
2
t, y

λ
1
t
/
 y


λ
2
t and if
α ∈ 0, 1/2,then
lim
λ→0



y

λ


 0, lim
λ→∞


y

λ


∞. 3.28
This completes the proof.
Example 3.3. Consider the following singular boundary value problem:
y
n
tλ


μy
a
ty
−b
t

 0,t∈ 0, 1,
y
i
0y
n−2
10, 0 ≤ i ≤ n − 2,
3.29
where λ, a, b > 0, μ ≥ 0, max{a, b} < 1/n − 1.
Applying Theorem 3.2,letα  max{a, b} < 1/n − 1, qt1, gyμy
a
, hyy
−b
,
then
gty ≥ t
α
gy,h

t
−1

≥ t
α

hy,

1
0

s
n−1
n − 2s

−α
ds < ∞.
3.30
Thus all conditions in Theorem 3.2 are satisfied. We can find 3.29 has a unique positive so-
lution y

λ
t. In addition, 0 <λ
1

2
implies y

λ
1
≤ y

λ
2
,y


λ
1
/
 y

λ
2
.Ifα  max{a, b}∈0, 1/2,
then
lim
λ→0



y

λ


 0, lim
λ→∞


y

λ


∞. 3.31
Chengjun Yuan et al. 7

4. Uniqueness positive solution of difference equations 1.2
This section discusses singular higher-order boundary value problem 1.2. Throughout this
section, we let Ki, j be Green’s function to −Δ
2
yiui  10, i ∈ N, y0yT  10,
we note that
Ki, j







jT  1 − i
T  1
, 0 ≤ j ≤ i − 1,
iT  1 − j
T  1
,i≤ j ≤ T  1,
4.1
and one can show that
Ki, i ≥ Ki, j,Kj, j ≥ Ki, j,Ki, j ≥
Ki, i
T  1
, for 0 ≤ i ≤ T  1, 1 ≤ j ≤ T. 4.2
Suppose that y is a positive solution of 1.2.Let
xiΔ
n−2
yi, for 0 ≤ i ≤ T  1. 4.3

From Δ
i
y0Δ
n−2
yT  10, 0 ≤ i ≤ n − 2, and Δ
m
yi − 1Δ
m−1
yi − Δ
m−1
yi − 1,sowe
define operator T,by
Txiyi  n − 1
i1

l1
C
n−2
i−ln−1
xl, for 0 ≤ i ≤ T. 4.4
Then
Δ
2
xiλFi  n − 1,Txi  0, 0 ≤ i ≤ T − 1,λ>0,
x0xT  10.
4.5
Lemma 4.1. If xi is a solution of 4.5,thenyi is a solutionn of 1.2.
Proof. Since we remark that xi is a solution of 4.5,ifandonlyif
xi
T


j1
Ki, jλFj  n − 1,Txj, for 0 ≤ i ≤ T  1. 4.6
Let
Txiyi  n − 1, for 0 ≤ i ≤ T. 4.7
From 4.4 we find Δ
i
y0Δ
n−2
yT  10, 0 ≤ i ≤ n − 2, and xiΔ
n−2
yi,sothatyi is
asolutionof1.2.
Further, if yi is a solution o f 1.2,implythatxi is a solution of 4.5.
Let P  {x ∈ CN

, 0, ∞ | xi ≥ 0, for all i ∈ N

}. Obviously, P is a normal cone of
Banach space CN

, 0, ∞.
8 Boundary Value Problems
Theorem 4.2. Suppose that there exists α ∈ 0, 1 such that
gtx ≥ t
α
gx,
h

t

−1
x

≥ t
α
gx,
4.8
for any t ∈ 0, 1 and x>0,andq ∈ CN

, 0, ∞.
Then 1.2 has a unique positive solution y

λ
i. And moreover, 0 <λ
1

2
implies y

λ
1
≤ y

λ
2
,
y

λ
1

/
 y

λ
2
.Ifα ∈ 0, 1/2,then
lim
λ→0



y

λ


 0, lim
λ→∞


y

λ


∞. 4.9
Proof. The proof is the same as that of Theorem 3.2,from4.12 and 4.13, one has
h

t

−1
x

≥ t
α
hx,h

1
t

≥ t
α
h1,htx ≤
1
t
α
hx,ht ≤
1
t
α
h1, for t ∈ 0, 1,x>0;
gtx ≥ t
α
gx,gt ≥ t
α
g1, for t ∈ 0, 1,x>0.
4.10
gtx ≥ t
α
gx,gt ≥ t

α
g1, for t ∈ 0, 1,x>0. 4.11
Let t  1/x, x > 1, one has
gx ≤ x
α
g1, for x ≥ 1. 4.12
Let eiKi, i/T  1, and we define
Q
e


x ∈ P |
1
M
ei ≤ xi ≤ Mei, for 0 ≤ i ≤ T  1

, 4.13
where M>1 is chosen such that
M>max


λT  1g1
T

j1
qj  n − 1

j1

l1

C
n−2
j−ln−1

α
 λT  1
1α
h1
T

j1
K
−α
j, jqj  n − 1

1/1−α
;

λg1
T

j1
qj  n − 1

Kj, j
T  1

α
 λh1
T


j1
qj  n − 1

j1

l1
C
n−2
j−ln−1

−α

−1/1−α

.
4.14
From 4.4 and 4.13, for any x ∈ Q
e
,wehave
1
M
ej ≤ Txj
j1

l1
C
n−2
j−ln−1
xl ≤ Mej

j1

l1
C
n−2
j−ln−1
, for 0 ≤ j ≤ T. 4.15
Chengjun Yuan et al. 9
For any x, y ∈ Q
e
, we define
A
λ
x, yiλ
T

j1
Ki, jqj  n − 1gTxj  hTyj, for 0 ≤ i ≤ T  1. 4.16
First we show that A
λ
: Q
e
× Q
e
→ Q
e
.
Let x, y ∈ Q
e
, from 4.11 and 4.12,wehave

gTxj ≤ g

Mej
j1

l1
C
n−2
j−ln−1

≤g

M
j1

l1
C
n−2
j−ln−1

≤M
α

j1

l1
C
n−2
j−ln−1


α
g1, for 1≤j ≤ T
,
4.17
and from 4.10,wehave
hTyj ≤ h

1
M
ej

≤ e
−α
jh

1
M

≤ M
α
e
−α
jh1, for 1 ≤ j ≤ T. 4.18
Then, from 4.2 and the above, we have
A
λ
x, yi ≤ λKi, i
T

j1

qj  n − 1gTxj  T  1hTyj
≤ eiM
α
λT  1

g1
T

j1
qj  n − 1

j1

l1
C
n−2
j−ln−1

α
 h1
T

j1
e
−α
jqj  n − 1

≤ eiM
α
λT  1


g1
T

j1
qj  n − 1

j1

l1
C
n−2
j−ln−1

α
 h1
T

j1

Kj, j
T  1

−α
qj  n − 1

≤ Mei, for 0 ≤ i ≤ T  1.
4.19
On the other hand, for any x, y ∈ Q
e

,from4.10 and 4.12,wehave
gxj ≥ g

1
M
ej

≥ e
α
j
1
M
α
g1, for 1 ≤ j ≤ T, 4.20
hyj ≥ h

Mej
j1

l1
C
n−2
j−ln−1

≥ M
−α

j1

l1

C
n−2
j−ln−1

−α
h1, for 1 ≤ j ≤ T. 4.21
Thus, from 4.2 and 4.16,wehave
A
λ
x, yi ≥ λei

T

j0
qj  n − 1gTxj 
T

j0
qj  n − 1hTyj

≥ λeiM
−α

g1
T

j0
qj

Ki, i

T  1

α
 h1
T

j0
qj  n − 1

j1

l1
C
n−2
j−ln−1

−α


1
M
ei, for 0 ≤ i ≤ T  1.
4.22
10 Boundary Value Problems
So, A
λ
is well defined and A
λ
Q
e

× Q
e
 ⊂ Q
e
.
Next, for any l ∈ 0, 1, one has
A
λ

lx, l
−1
y

iλ
T

j1
Ki, jqj  n − 1

gTlxj  h

T

l
−1

yj

 λ
T


j1
Ki, jqj  n − 1

glTxj  h

l
−1
Tyj

≥ λ
T

j1
Ki, jqj  n − 1

l
α
gTxj  l
α
hTyj

ds
 l
α
A
λ
x, yi, for 0 ≤ i ≤ T  1.
4.23
So the conditions of Theorems 2.2 and 2.3 hold. Therefore, there exists a unique x


λ
∈ Q
e
such
that A
λ
x

,x

x

λ
. It is easy to check that x

λ
is a unique positive solution of 4.5 for given
λ>0. Moreover, Theorem 2.3 means that if 0 <λ
1

2
, then x

λ
1
t ≤ x

λ
2

t, x

λ
1
t
/
 x

λ
2
t and
if α ∈ 0, 1/2,then
lim
λ→0



x

λ


 0, lim
λ→∞


x

λ



∞. 4.24
Next, on using Lemma 3.1,from4.5,wegetthaty

λ
 Tx

λ
is a unique positive solution
of 1.2 for given λ>0. Moreover, if 0 <λ
1

2
, then y

λ
1
t ≤ y

λ
2
t, y

λ
1
t
/
 y

λ

2
t and if
α ∈ 0, 1/2,then
lim
λ→0



y

λ


 0, lim
λ→∞


y

λ


∞. 4.25
This completes the proof.
Example 4.3. Consider the following singular boundary value problem:
Δ
n
yi − 1λ

μy

a
iy
−b
i

 0,i∈ N,
Δ
i
y0Δ
n−2
y10, 0 ≤ i ≤ n − 2,
4.26
where λ, a, b > 0, μ ≥ 0, max{a, b} < 1.
Let qi1, gyμy
a
, hyy
−b
, α  max{a, b} < 1, then
gty ≥ t
α
gy,h

t
−1
y

≥ t
α
hy, 4.27
thus all conditions in Theorem 4.2 are satisfied. We can find 4.26 has a unique positive so-

lution y

λ
t. In addition, 0 <λ
1

2
implies y

λ
1
≤ y

λ
2
,y

λ
1
/
 y

λ
2
.Ifα  max{a, b}∈0, 1/2,
then
lim
λ→0




y

λ


 0, lim
λ→∞


y

λ


∞. 4.28
Chengjun Yuan et al. 11
Acknowledgments
The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China Grants no.
10571021 and 10701020. The work was supported by Subject Foundation of Harbin University
Grant no. HXK200714.
References
1 Y. Guo and J. Tian, “Positive solutions of m-point boundary value problems for higher order ordinary
differential equations,” Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications, vol. 66, no. 7, pp. 1573–1586,
2007.
2 D. Jiang, “Multiple positive solutions to singular boundary value problems for superlinear higher-
order ODEs,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 40, no. 2-3, pp. 249–259, 2000.
3 P. W. Eloe and J. Henderson, “Singular nonlinear boundary value problems for higher order ordi-
nary differential equations,” Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–10,
1991.

4 P. W. Eloe and J. Henderson, “Postive solutions for higher order differential equations,” Journal of
Differential Equations, vol. 3, pp. 1–8, 1995.
5 C. J. Chyan and J. Henderson, “Positive solutions for singular higher order nonlinear equations,”
Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 153–160, 1994.
6 X. Lin, D. Jiang, and X. Li, “Existence and uniqueness of solutions for singular k, n − k conjugate
boundary value problems,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 52, no. 3-4, pp. 375–382,
2006.
7 R. P. Agarwal and D. O’Regan, “Existence theory for single and multiple solutions to singular positone
boundary value problems,” Journal of Differential Equations, vol. 175, no. 2, pp. 393–414, 2001.
8 P. R. Agarwal and D. O’Regan, “Singular discrete boundary value problems,” Applied Mathematics
Letters, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 127–131, 1999.
9 R. P. Agarwal and F H. Wong, “Existence of positive solutions for higher order difference equations,”
Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 67–74, 1997.
10 Z. Du, C. Xue, and W. Ge, “Triple solutions for a higher-order difference equation,” Journal of Inequali-
ties in Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 6, no. 1, Article 10, pp. 1–11, 2005.
11 P. J. Y. Wong and R. P. Agarwal, “On the existence of solutions of singular boundary value problems
for higher order difference equations,” Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications
,vol.28,no.2,
pp. 277–287, 1997.
12 R. P. Agarwal and P. J. Y. Wong, “Existence of solutions for singular boundary problems for higher
order differential equations,” Rendiconti del Seminario Matem
`
atico e Fisico di Milano, vol. 65, pp. 249–
264, 1995.
13 R. P. Agarwal and F H. Wong, “Existence of positive solutions for higher order difference equations,”
Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 67–74, 1997.
14 X. Lin, D. Jiang, and X. Li, “Existence and uniqueness of solutions for singular fourth-order boundary
value problems,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 196, no. 1, pp. 155–161, 2006.
15 Z. Zengqin, “Uniqueness of positive solutions for singular nonlinear second-order boundary-value
problems,” Nonlinear Analysis. Theory, Methods & Applications, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 755–765, 1994.

16 R. P. Agarwal and I. Kiguradze, “Two-point boundary value problems for higher-order linear differ-
ential equations with strong singularities,” Boundary Value Problems, vol. 2006, Article ID 83910, 32
pages, 2006.
17 X. Hao, L. Liu, and Y. Wu, “Positive solutions for nonlinear nth-order singular nonlocal boundary
value problems,” Boundary Value Problems, vol. 2007, Article ID 74517, 10 pages, 2007.
18 D. Guo, The Order Methods in Nonlinear Analysis, Shandong Technical and Science Press, Jinan, China,
2000.

×