Tải bản đầy đủ (.docx) (4 trang)

Tiếng anh ngày 2

Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (36.49 KB, 4 trang )

Tiếng Anh ngày 2 (8/3)

I/ Trả lời câu hỏi bài 1:
1/ What did the 2 studies find out?
- Litvin et all finds out that “not reduce use of antibiotics overall/specific
target conditions”.
- Nakhoul finds out that “more than 50% of patients with positive rapid test
and DNA test”.
2/ What is the persistent problem? What did the investigators try to do? Explain the
use of antibiotics for ARIs.
- Poor quality of antibiotic use in ambulatory care.
- Focus on reducing: inappropriate overuse of antibiotics (non-bacterial, selflimited infections); and inappropriate underuse (not use antibiotics when
necessary).
3/ What are 3 board issues of strategies to reduce unsuitable antibiotic
prescription?
- Heterogeneity of clinical settings.
- Importance of multidimensional interventions.
- Requirement for implementation strategies.
4/ What are the negative aspects from the study by Litvin and Nakhoul?
- Not include components related to patient attitudes and expectations for
antibiotics.
- Patient and provider educational interventions.
- Social marketing campaigns to success in health promotions and behavior
change.


5/ What problems of antibiotic overuse did Shortell and Damschroder find out?
What is the role of local context? What should be done?
- Problems:
+ Lack of connection between changing behavior and benefits of change.
+ Lack of organization readiess to change.


+ Low compatibility with exiting values and social norms of staff and
patients.
- Local context: success of:
+ Diagnostic algorithms.
+ Educational programs.
+ Decision support tools.
- What should be done:
+ Individualize treatment.
+ Strategies with local adaptation of interventions.
6/ What is the conclusion?
- Overuse of antibiotics is the major public health concern.
- Inadequate engagement of stakeholders and individuals.
- Mismatch between societal benefits and individual patient-clinician.

II/ Bài 2: Tackling Disparities in Influenza Vaccination in Primary Care
1/ Warm up:
- List current kinds of vaccine?
- Difference among vaccination, innoculation, and immunization?


- What are 3 aspects of prevention? Explain.
- Is influenza vaccination nesessary? Why/ Why not?
2/ Ý chính của từng đoạn:
- 1st paragraph: General view.
- 2nd paragraph: Introduction.
- 3rd paragraph: How the research was
carried out.
- 4 paragraph: Caveat accompanying
the findings.
th


- 5 paragraph: Key barriers and
facilitators among minority patients.
th

- 6th paragraph: Patient’s cultural
attitudes.
- 7th paragraph: Skeptical patients
attitudes to refusal of vaccination.
- 8th , 9th , 10th , 11th, 12th paragraph:
Guidance.
- 13th paragraph: Conclusion.

3/ Vocabulary:
- Account for

- Proactive (patients)

- Mutable

- Adamant

- Conundrum

- Entail

- Supoptimal

- Be embedded with something


- Disparity

- Standing order

- Uptake

- Huddle

- Caveat

- Debrief

- Hypothetical scenario

- Outreach

- Eliminate

- Impending

- Be in the ball park

- Feasible


4/ Excersise:
1B

2B


6/ Homework:
- Exercise 6 – 10.
- Vocabulary
- Warm up.

3-bỏ vì đề khơng rõ

4A

5D



Tài liệu bạn tìm kiếm đã sẵn sàng tải về

Tải bản đầy đủ ngay
×