Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (143.92 KB, 1 trang )
mild or no symptoms and no focal findings on physical examination, then
discharge with follow-up in a few days is appropriate. If the diagnosis is still
unclear after plain films and there is a historical or clinical suspicion of
aspiration, fluoroscopy or chest CT may be considered, though is not always
necessary. In some instances, despite normal radiographic or fluoroscopic
findings, bronchoscopy is indicated to confirm the presence or absence of a
foreign body when there is a high clinical index of suspicion. It is reasonable to
proceed directly to bronchoscopy if there is an acute onset of focal physical
findings (unilateral wheeze, decreased aeration) or a convincing aspiration history
(witnessed event, choking history with typically aspirated foods: nuts, seeds,
apples).
History of possible foreign body aspiration
(patient NPO until disposition determined)
i
Inspiratory and expiratory chest radiographs3
Normal or Equivocal^ Radiographs
Suggestive Radiographs0
1
History and
physical examination
not suggestive
for aspiration
History or
physical examination
suspicious for